From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 203943] ext4 corruption after RAID6 degraded; e2fsck skips block checks and fails
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 14:52:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-203943-13602-TNwOaykekc@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-203943-13602@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203943
--- Comment #3 from Yann Ormanns (yann@ormanns.net) ---
Andreas & Ted, thank you for your replies.
(In reply to Andreas Dilger from comment #1)
> This seems like a RAID problem and not an ext4 problem. The RAID array
> shouldn't be returning random garbage if one of the drives is unavailable.
> Maybe it is not doing data parity verification on reads, so that it is
> blindly returning bad blocks from the failed drive rather than
> reconstructing valid data from parity if the drive does not fail completely?
How can I check that? At least running "checkarray" did not find anything new
or helpful.
(In reply to Theodore Tso from comment #2)
> Did you resync the disks *before* you ran e2fsck? Or only afterwards?
1. my RAID6 got degraded and ext4 errors showed up
2. I ran e2fsck, it consumed all memory and showed only "Inode %$i block %$b
conflicts with critical metadata, skipping block checks."
3. I replaced the faulty disk and resynced the RAID6
4. e2fsck was able to clean the filesystem
5. I simulated a drive fault (so my RAID6 had n+1 working disks left)
6. the ext4 FS got corrupted again
7. although the RAID is clean again, e2fsck is not able to clean the FS (like
in step 2)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-21 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-21 6:51 [Bug 203943] New: ext4 corruption after RAID6 degraded; e2fsck skips block checks and fails bugzilla-daemon
2019-06-21 7:15 ` [Bug 203943] " bugzilla-daemon
2019-06-21 12:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-06-21 14:52 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2019-06-21 18:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-06-21 19:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-06-21 20:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-06-22 7:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-06-22 8:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-10-31 1:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-203943-13602-TNwOaykekc@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.