All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 209243] [regression] fsx IO_URING reading get BAD DATA
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:07:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-209243-201763-opaRuXiAHH@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-209243-201763@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209243

Zorro Lang (zlang@redhat.com) changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |axboe@kernel.dk
            Summary|fsx IO_URING reading get    |[regression] fsx IO_URING
                   |BAD DATA                    |reading get BAD DATA

--- Comment #5 from Zorro Lang (zlang@redhat.com) ---
Finally, I find the first commit which can reproduce this failure:

commit c3cf992c25c7ff04bfc4dec5c916705a5332320e
Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date:   Fri May 22 09:24:42 2020 -0600

    io_uring: support true async buffered reads, if file provides it

    If the file is flagged with FMODE_BUF_RASYNC, then we don't have to punt
    the buffered read to an io-wq worker. Instead we can rely on page
    unlocking callbacks to support retry based async IO. This is a lot more
    efficient than doing async thread offload.

    The retry is done similarly to how we handle poll based retry. From
    the unlock callback, we simply queue the retry to a task_work based
    handler.

    Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

So CC the author of this patch to get more review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-14  7:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-12  5:46 [Bug 209243] New: fsx IO_URING reading get BAD DATA bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-12  5:50 ` [Bug 209243] " bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-13  7:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-13 15:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-13 18:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-14  7:07 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2020-09-14 13:39 ` [Bug 209243] [regression] " bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-14 15:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-14 15:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-14 18:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-14 19:49 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-209243-201763-opaRuXiAHH@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.