[Bug 213013] getopt.3: further clarify behaviour

[bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213013

--- Comment #5 from Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) (alx.manpages@gmail.com) ---
Hi James,

Sorry for the delay!

(In reply to James Hunt from comment #4)
> Thanks again for reviewing. I've updated the patch but I still think it
> needs to be "spelt out" that two plus symbols may be required since that
> avoids any confusion.

Okay.

> Also, I'm afraid I'm using a webmailer so submitting patches to a mailing
> list is going to be painful for me, whereas this bugzilla is quick and easy
> (and doesn't require me to register,

BTW, you don't need to subscribe to <linux-man@vger.kernel.org> to post there
:-)
But, I understand the rest.

> format mails in particular ways, plus
> of course to manage a ton more emails ;) But if the real action is happening
> on the ML, I wonder if in the future it might be possible to forward all
> bugzilla activity automatically to the ML rather than _vice versa_?

Yes.  After you said these, I remembered that I asked about that some time ago.
 The ML was subscribed again to this bugzilla activity :)

Now the review:

Could you please use '.IR ...' instead of '\fI...\fP...'?

See this extract from man-manpages(7):

[[
       The preferred way to write this in the source file is:

           .BR fcntl ()

       (Using this format, rather than the use of  "\fB...\fP()"
       makes it easier to write tools that parse man page source
       files.)
]]


> Thanks again for your help.

Thank you!

Alex

-- 
You may reply to this email to add a comment.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.