All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 219652] READ CAPACITY(16) not used on large USB-attached drive in recent kernels
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 02:26:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-219652-11613-fPVVd6wRXq@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-219652-11613@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219652

--- Comment #8 from Kris Karas (bugs-a21@moonlit-rail.com) ---
For Martin in comment #5:

    # : Working kernel sg_readcap
     00     ff ff ff ff 00 00 02 00
    # : Ditto --16
     00     00 00 00 01 5d 50 a3 ae  00 00 02 00 00 00 00 00
     10     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    # : Failing kernel sg_readcap
     00     ff ff ff fe 00 00 02 00
    # : Ditto --16
     00     00 00 00 01 5d 50 a3 ae  00 00 02 00 00 00 00 00
     10     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

As Michael surmised, the only difference I can see from the above is in the
regular READ_CAPACITY, returning ffffffff normally and fffffffe under the
failing patch.

For Alan in comment #4 and Michael in comment #6:

I spent a couple hours staring at the code (all of it new to me), and the only
thing I could see pre/post patch is that the retry loop was moved one level
down.  Commands passed, buffers, etc., look the same.  Timing/Race?

Command buffer is a bit bigger (16 vs 10).  sshdr.ascq is checked (== 0x00)
pre-patch but not post-patch.  Retry count 13 vs 10.

Can you guys write me a couple sd_printk()'s you would like to see in there?  I
am not familiar with the structure extractors enough to craft a printk with
useful info in it.

-- 
You may reply to this email to add a comment.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-03  2:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-02  0:57 [Bug 219652] New: READ CAPACITY(16) not used on large USB-attached drive in recent kernels bugzilla-daemon
2025-01-02  0:58 ` [Bug 219652] " bugzilla-daemon
2025-01-02  0:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-01-02  5:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-01-02  5:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-01-02 15:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-01-02 23:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-01-03  0:53 ` [Bug 219652] New: " Mike Christie
2025-01-03  0:53 ` [Bug 219652] " bugzilla-daemon
2025-01-03  2:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-01-03  2:26 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2025-01-03  3:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-01-03  3:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-01-04  3:50   ` Mike Christie
2025-01-03  3:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-01-04  3:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-01-06 20:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-01-06 21:08 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-219652-11613-fPVVd6wRXq@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.