From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 220069] [6.13.9] regression USB controller dies
Date: Thu, 01 May 2025 07:45:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-220069-208809-HmqpmNynAL@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-220069-208809@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220069
--- Comment #13 from Michał Pecio (michal.pecio@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Claudio Wunder from comment #11)
> OOC, X670E is my chipset, I assume it is indeed part of the buggy club. I
> could change my motherboard, something like X870E (Assuming the 800 series
> by ASMedia does not have the same issue); Just to rule out the "this is
> probably the chipset" culprit.
That's an assumption ;)
A simpler thing is to try different USB ports (rear or front panel) and see if
any are connected to different (probably in-CPU) controllers. Or get a PCIe
card, those with Renesas uPD720201/uPD720202 chips are reliable, though 5Gbps
only.
Your problem seems to be HW specific, because others generally stopped
complaining after 6.13.7. I have heard about one more case of "Abort failed to
stop command ring: -110" and suggested filing a bug here, but the reporter
never did.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-01 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-29 14:28 [Bug 220069] New: [6.13.9] regression USB controller dies bugzilla-daemon
2025-04-29 20:07 ` [Bug 220069] " bugzilla-daemon
2025-04-29 20:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-04-29 20:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-04-30 5:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-04-30 8:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-04-30 9:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-04-30 9:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-04-30 9:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-04-30 21:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-04-30 22:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-04-30 22:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-01 7:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-01 7:45 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2025-05-01 9:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-01 21:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-01 21:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-01 23:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-02 0:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-02 0:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-02 9:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-02 11:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-02 11:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-03 0:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-03 8:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-03 12:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-03 12:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-03 14:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-03 17:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-03 18:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-03 19:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-04 11:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-04 12:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-04 13:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-04 14:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-04 17:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-05 8:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-05 8:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-05 9:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-05 9:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-05 9:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-05 9:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-05 10:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-05 14:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-05 21:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-05 21:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-07 23:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-11 11:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-11 12:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-11 12:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-11 12:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-11 13:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-15 10:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-17 16:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-18 23:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-19 0:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-19 0:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-19 6:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-19 12:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-20 16:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-20 16:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-23 21:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-23 21:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-12 12:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-12 20:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-220069-208809-HmqpmNynAL@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.