From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 221077] New: [iio] [hid-sensor-rotation] Memory corruption due to alignment mismatch in scan buffer
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 05:12:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-221077-217253@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221077
Bug ID: 221077
Summary: [iio] [hid-sensor-rotation] Memory corruption due to
alignment mismatch in scan buffer
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: IIO
Assignee: drivers_iio@kernel-bugs.kernel.org
Reporter: lixu.zhang@intel.com
Regression: Yes
Bisected b31a74075cb4ca2bb202a2e17d133ef3c9ee891f
commit-id:
### Problem
In `drivers/iio/orientation/hid-sensor-rotation.c`, the `scale_pre_decml` and
`scale_post_decml` fields in `struct dev_rot_state` get corrupted after the
first read from the device. This issue results in invalid scale values being
reported to userspace.
### Root Cause Analysis
The issue is caused by a size mismatch between what the IIO core expects for
the scan buffer and the actual size of the driver's scan structure.
1. **Driver Structure**: The `scan` struct in `dev_rot_state` consists of a
quaternion (4 * s32 = 16 bytes) and a timestamp (8 bytes).
```c
struct {
s32 sampled_vals[4];
aligned_s64 timestamp;
} scan;
```
Without explicit alignment, this structure is packed to **24 bytes**.
2. **IIO Core Expectation**: The `iio_compute_scan_bytes` function calculates
the buffer size required. It aligns the total size to the size of the *largest
element* in the scan.
- The quaternion channel is treated as a single 16-byte element.
- Therefore, the core aligns the total size to 16 bytes: `ALIGN(24, 16) =
32 bytes`.
3. **Corruption**: When `iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp()` is called:
- It assumes a 32-byte buffer.
- It writes the timestamp at the end of the aligned buffer (offset 24).
- Since the driver allocated only 24 bytes for `scan`, the write at offset
24 overwrites the adjacent `scale_pre_decml` field in `struct dev_rot_state`.
### Evidence (Ftrace)
I verified this by tracing the return values of `iio_storage_bytes_for_si` and
`iio_compute_scan_bytes` using kretprobes:
```log
$ cat /sys/kernel/tracing/trace_pipe
r_store_bytes: (iio_compute_scan_bytes+0x30/0xd0 [industrialio] <-
iio_storage_bytes_for_si) arg1=0x10
r_store_bytes: (iio_compute_scan_bytes+0xa1/0xd0 [industrialio] <-
iio_storage_bytes_for_si) arg1=0x8
r_calc_bytes: (__iio_update_buffers+0x99d/0xd40 [industrialio] <-
iio_compute_scan_bytes) arg1=0x20
```
The trace confirms:
- Largest element = 16 bytes.
- Total raw size = 16 (quat) + 8 (ts) = 24 bytes.
- Final aligned size = ALIGN(24, 16) = 32 bytes.
The memory layout mismatch is:
- IIO Core needs: 32 bytes
- Driver struct has: 24 bytes
### Regression
This issue was introduced by commit `b31a74075cb4 ("iio: orientation:
hid-sensor-rotation: remove unnecessary alignment")`, which removed the
`__aligned(16)` attribute that previously ensured the struct was padded to 32
bytes.
### Proposed Fix
Revert the removal of `__aligned(16)` to ensure `struct dev_rot_state` has the
correct padding to match the IIO core's expectations.
```c
struct {
s32 sampled_vals[4] __aligned(16);
aligned_s64 timestamp;
} scan;
```
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
next reply other threads:[~2026-02-11 5:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-11 5:12 bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2026-02-14 19:24 ` [Bug 221077] New: [iio] [hid-sensor-rotation] Memory corruption due to alignment mismatch in scan buffer Jonathan Cameron
2026-02-14 20:29 ` David Lechner
2026-02-15 16:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-02-14 19:24 ` [Bug 221077] " bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-14 20:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-15 16:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-16 6:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-16 7:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-24 2:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-221077-217253@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.