From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 27297] New: Gallium R300g - xscreensaver "endgame" hack runs
much slower than under classic Mesa.
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
To: dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27297
Summary: Gallium R300g - xscreensaver "endgame" hack runs much
slower than under classic Mesa.
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Drivers/DRI/r300
AssignedTo: dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
ReportedBy: rankincj@googlemail.com
Using Mesa from git and Radeon 9550 (RV350). Under "classic" Mesa, the
"endgame" OpenGL hack from xscreensaver runs at between 15 fps and 20 fps.
However, it only runs at between 3 fps and 5 fps under Gallium. The CPU load
under Gallium is considerably higher too.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
--