All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 47701] New: When too many disks fall out at the same time, RCU hangs
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:13:09 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-47701-11613@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47701

           Summary: When too many disks fall out at the same time, RCU
                    hangs
           Product: IO/Storage
           Version: 2.5
    Kernel Version: 3.5.4
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
              Tree: Mainline
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: SCSI
        AssignedTo: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
        ReportedBy: sgunderson@bigfoot.com
        Regression: No


Hi,

For whatever reason, I lost all of my disks at the same time (I guess a SAS
cable fell out; I'll know tomorrow). As was expected, I/O on the machine was
not so happy afterwards; what was not so expected, was the following output on
the serial console a minute or so after:

[292657.601264] INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU[292657.602441] INFO:
rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 6} (detected by 4, t=60002 jiffies)
[292657.602444] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start

[292657.620982]  {[292657.622964]  6}  (t=60024 jiffies)
Pid: 7800, comm: kworker/u:9 Not tainted 3.5.4 #1
[292657.631337] Call Trace:
[292657.634069]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff8108ecaf>] __rcu_pending+0xbd/0x417
[292657.640471]  [<ffffffff8108f0de>] rcu_check_callbacks+0xd5/0x138
[292657.646765]  [<ffffffff81041b73>] update_process_times+0x3c/0x73
[292657.653050]  [<ffffffff81072076>] tick_sched_timer+0x6a/0x93
[292657.658999]  [<ffffffff8105301e>] __run_hrtimer+0xb3/0x13e
[292657.664763]  [<ffffffff8107200c>] ? tick_nohz_handler+0xd3/0xd3
[292657.670972]  [<ffffffff8103b7a3>] ? __do_softirq+0x16c/0x182
[292657.676916]  [<ffffffff810533d5>] hrtimer_interrupt+0xce/0x1b0
[292657.683030]  [<ffffffff8101ad3d>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x81/0x94
[292657.689676]  [<ffffffff81377447>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x67/0x70
[292657.695965]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff813703dd>] ?
_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x9/0xb
[292657.703695]  [<ffffffff8123daaa>] scsi_remove_target+0x137/0x153
[292657.709985]  [<ffffffff812425dc>] sas_rphy_remove+0x25/0x4e
[292657.715841]  [<ffffffff81242616>] sas_rphy_delete+0x11/0x1e
[292657.721699]  [<ffffffff81242648>] sas_port_delete+0x25/0x11a
[292657.727644]  [<ffffffff8136de53>] ? mutex_unlock+0x9/0xb
[292657.733254]  [<ffffffffa0020fd5>] mpt2sas_transport_port_remove+0x16f/0x190
[mpt2sas]
[292657.741576]  [<ffffffffa001a70b>] _scsih_remove_device+0x58/0x84 [mpt2sas]
[292657.748731]  [<ffffffffa001a7f4>] _scsih_device_remove_by_handle+0xbd/0xc6
[mpt2sas]
[292657.756960]  [<ffffffffa001c5bb>]
_scsih_sas_topology_change_event+0x422/0x46d [mpt2sas]
[292657.765531]  [<ffffffff81064556>] ? idle_balance+0xde/0x10c
[292657.771395]  [<ffffffffa001e098>] ? _scsih_abort+0x1c1/0x1c1 [mpt2sas]
[292657.778212]  [<ffffffffa001e38d>] _firmware_event_work+0x2f5/0x920
[mpt2sas]
[292657.785547]  [<ffffffff81042089>] ? add_timer+0x17/0x1a
[292657.791058]  [<ffffffff8104bc64>] ? queue_delayed_work_on+0xda/0xe8
[292657.797607]  [<ffffffffa001e098>] ? _scsih_abort+0x1c1/0x1c1 [mpt2sas]
[292657.804418]  [<ffffffff8104c641>] process_one_work+0x253/0x3c5
[292657.810534]  [<ffffffff8104cbb7>] worker_thread+0x1d4/0x34d
[292657.816394]  [<ffffffff8104c9e3>] ? rescuer_thread+0x230/0x230
[292657.822511]  [<ffffffff810500bb>] kthread+0x84/0x8c
[292657.827675]  [<ffffffff81377c94>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[292657.833875]  [<ffffffff81050037>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x58/0x58
[292657.841117]  [<ffffffff81377c90>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb

I'm reporting this primarily because it could cause problems in some other
context (say, when only one or two disks disappear); of course, for me in this
case, it wouldn't matter if I/O was "properly" rejected or the entire machine
hanged, it's useless anyway.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

             reply	other threads:[~2012-09-18 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-18 23:13 bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2012-10-06 14:30 ` [Bug 47701] When too many disks fall out at the same time, RCU hangs bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-07  2:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-07 14:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-11-19 23:10 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-47701-11613@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.