All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 60758] module scsi_wait_scan not found kernel panic on boot
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 20:50:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-60758-11613-ryBlSpWcK3@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-60758-11613@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60758

--- Comment #11 from Jeff Zhou <jz.researcher@yahoo.com> ---
Thanks. I am a bit curious about the description in Kconfig,
since the scsi_wait_scan.ko was built from scsi_wait_scan.c, which was removed
in v.3.6.
How to refer a non-exist module, as described in the section of "config
SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC"

>From v.3.5.7 to v.3.6.1, there is a change in source code, but it seems the
documentation in Kconfig has not been updated.




(In reply to Alan Bartlett from comment #7)
> (In reply to Jeff Zhou from comment #5)
> > If your system fails by "module scsi_wait_scan not found", then it could be
> > the init script issue in your CentOS box.
> > 
> > The last kernel with scsi_wait_scan.ko is v3.5.7, it has been removed ever
> > since v3.6. Any init script for 3.10 should not use that module.
> > 
> > 
> > Another point is in your config, the CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC is not set, try
> > to turn it into Y and see what's happening.
> 
> Jeff, 
> 
> For the fuller picture please see --
> 
> http://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=401
> 
> This non-booting issue only occurs with one system. The reporter has other
> systems which do boot correctly using the same kernel(s).
> 
> As was explained in the referenced bug report (note 3235), the mention of
> "module scsi_wait_scan not found" is a red-herring.
> 
> Note the following section from the 3.10.10 drivers/scsi/Kconfig file --
> 
> [quote]
> config SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC
>         bool "Asynchronous SCSI scanning"
>         depends on SCSI
>         help
>           The SCSI subsystem can probe for devices while the rest of the
>           system continues booting, and even probe devices on different
>           busses in parallel, leading to a significant speed-up.
> 
>           If you have built SCSI as modules, enabling this option can
>           be a problem as the devices may not have been found by the
>           time your system expects them to have been.  You can load the
>           scsi_wait_scan module to ensure that all scans have completed.
>           If you build your SCSI drivers into the kernel, then everything
>           will work fine if you say Y here.
> 
>           You can override this choice by specifying "scsi_mod.scan=sync"
>           or async on the kernel's command line.
> [/quote]
> 
> It still makes a reference to the scsi_wait_scan module and advises against
> setting SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC=y when scsi drivers have been built as modules.
> 
> It is unnecessary to build a new kernel to test, as per your last point.
> Just appending "scsi_mod.scan=async" to the kernel boot line will be
> sufficient.
> 
> Perhaps the reporter will test with that and then report back?
> 
> Alan / burakkucat.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-31 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-16 19:17 [Bug 60758] New: module scsi_wait_scan not found kernel panic on boot bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-16 19:18 ` [Bug 60758] " bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-16 23:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-29  5:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-30  7:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31  3:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31  4:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 16:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 16:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 17:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 17:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 20:50 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2013-08-31 21:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 21:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 22:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 22:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-01  0:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-01  0:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-01  2:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-02 14:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-02 19:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-02 19:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-03  5:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-03 10:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-03 15:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-03 15:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-04  4:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-04  9:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-04  9:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22  8:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22 13:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22 13:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22 14:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22 21:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22 22:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22 22:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22 22:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22 23:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-23  9:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-10-19 15:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-10-22  6:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-10-23 11:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-10-23 11:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-10-23 13:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-11-06 11:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-11-06 15:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-11-08 15:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-11-13 22:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-11-14 11:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-06 21:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-06 21:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-26  9:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-26 22:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-27  1:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-31  6:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-01-22 21:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-01-29 10:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-02-07 15:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-02-21  5:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-02-21  5:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-02-21  5:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-10-08  2:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-06-10  6:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-06-10  6:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-06-10  8:12 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-60758-11613-ryBlSpWcK3@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.