From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 92709] "LLVM triggered Diagnostic Handler: unsupported call to function ldexpf in main" when starting race in stuntrally Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 02:58:26 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0485221535==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (unknown [131.252.210.165]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716AA6E6A7 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 18:58:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============0485221535== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1446605906.CcEa7cF3.2086"; charset="UTF-8" --1446605906.CcEa7cF3.2086 Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 02:58:26 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D92709 --- Comment #6 from Michel D=C3=A4nzer --- (In reply to Matt Arsenault from comment #5) > It seems bizarre that an llvm intrinsic would ever be changed to something > involving a library call. I think the exp2 -> ldexpf transform is rather questionable for us anyway, since we have a native exp2 instruction, isn't it? Maybe we just don't want= to use the LibCallSimplifier pass? The comment at the top of SimplifyLibCalls.= cpp kind of sounds like "this is not the pass you're looking for"... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --1446605906.CcEa7cF3.2086 Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 02:58:26 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Comment= # 6 on bug 92709<= /a> from Michel D=C3=A4nzer 
(In reply to Matt Arsenault from comment #5)
> It seems bizarre that an llvm intrinsic would ev=
er be changed to something
> involving a library call.

I think the exp2 -> ldexpf transform is rather questionable for us anywa=
y,
since we have a native exp2 instruction, isn't it? Maybe we just don't want=
 to
use the LibCallSimplifier pass? The comment at the top of SimplifyLibCalls.=
cpp
kind of sounds like "this is not the pass you're looking for"...<=
/pre>

You are receiving this mail because: =20=20=20=20=20=20
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
--1446605906.CcEa7cF3.2086-- --===============0485221535== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0 cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9kcmktZGV2ZWwK --===============0485221535==--