From: bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
To: linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [Bug 97051] get_mempolicy(2) inconsistent with numaif.h
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 09:19:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-97051-11311-tf7awIdcVv@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-97051-11311-3bo0kxnWaOQUvHkbgXJLS5sdmw4N0Rt+2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97051
--- Comment #1 from Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> ---
Andi, could you comment on this bug?
Thanks,
Michael
On 22 April 2015 at 00:28, <bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97051
>
> Bug ID: 97051
> Summary: get_mempolicy(2) inconsistent with numaif.h
> Product: Documentation
> Version: unspecified
> Hardware: All
> OS: Linux
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: man-pages
> Assignee: documentation_man-pages-ztI5WcYan/vQLgFONoPN62D2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org
> Reporter: nyh-TS7m/3hpY0sOpacJJkBjfT4kX+cae0hd@public.gmane.org
> Regression: No
>
> get_mempolicy(2)'s synopsis is:
>
> #include <numaif.h>
>
> int get_mempolicy(int *mode, unsigned long *nodemask,
> unsigned long maxnode, unsigned long addr,
> unsigned long flags);
>
> However, the actual prototype in numif.h (and implementation in numactl's
> syscall.c) is subtly different:
>
> long get_mempolicy(int *policy, const unsigned long *nmask,
> unsigned long maxnode, void *addr, int flags);
>
> The funny thing is, that prototype is isn't quite right either - it pretends
> nmask is a const pointer, but it most definitely isn't, and the data pointed by
> it get written to. But that isn't a man-page bug.
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-05 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-21 22:28 [Bug 97051] New: get_mempolicy(2) inconsistent with numaif.h bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r
[not found] ` <bug-97051-11311-3bo0kxnWaOQUvHkbgXJLS5sdmw4N0Rt+2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org/>
2015-05-05 9:19 ` bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-97051-11311-tf7awIdcVv@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon-590eeb7gvniway/ihj7yzeb+6bgklq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.