From: bugzilla at busybox.net <bugzilla@busybox.net>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [Bug 9846] New: musl libc not installed correctly in target folder
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 20:03:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-9846-163@https.bugs.busybox.net/> (raw)
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9846
Bug ID: 9846
Summary: musl libc not installed correctly in target folder
Product: buildroot
Version: 2017.02.1
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Other
Assignee: unassigned at buildroot.uclibc.org
Reporter: stefan at nilsson.tk
CC: buildroot at uclibc.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 7051
--> https://bugs.busybox.net/attachment.cgi?id=7051&action=edit
defconfigs for glibc/musl respectively
I am the deveveloper of a custom i386 based embedded Linux system, and I am
using buildroot to create the system images that goes into it.
I am currently running on the master branch of buildroot as of yesterday
2016-04-26 (6538125 package/pcsc-lite: bump version to 1.8.20) since I wanted
to try out the newly added s6 stuff:
However, I usually build my linux system using glibc and the busybox init
system. Yesterday I wanted to try out the musl libc to see how it performed
compared to glibc. But when changing to musl libc and after a "make clean"
"make", which goes through without issues, it appears as musl libc is not
installed correctly in the target folder.
When building with glibc as option, I get the following files in my
output/target/lib (among a bunch of others):
/lib/libc.so -> libc.so.6*
/lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.24.so*
/lib/libc-2.24.so*
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> ld-2.24.so*
/lib/ld-2.24.so*
When building with musl, I only get:
/lib/ld-musl-i386.so.1 -> /lib/libc.so
/lib/libc.so -> libc.so.6
So there is a symlink to libc.so.6, but file it points to does not exist which
makes my init fail to execute during boot.
When looking in my output/build/musl-1.1.16/lib, I guess I have the missing
files:
libc.a
libc.so*
But these seems to never be copied to the target folder correctly,...
If I manually copy the contents of output/build/musl-1.1.16/lib/ to /lib on my
target system (and remove the libc.so symlink), my init works as expected, and
I can boot it completely.
I have attached my buildroot defconfig for both configurations.
Best Regards
Stefan Nilsson
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next reply other threads:[~2017-04-27 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-27 20:03 bugzilla at busybox.net [this message]
2017-05-07 19:34 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 9846] musl libc not installed correctly in target folder bugzilla at busybox.net
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-9846-163@https.bugs.busybox.net/ \
--to=bugzilla@busybox.net \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.