From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/20] inflate: (arch) kill silly zlib typedefs References: <14.196662837@selenic.com> <20051031211422.GC4367@waste.org> <20051101065327.GP22601@alpha.home.local> <20051101085740.GR22601@alpha.home.local> From: Miles Bader Reply-To: Miles Bader Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:05:57 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20051101085740.GR22601@alpha.home.local> (Willy Tarreau's message of "Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:57:40 +0100") Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: miles.bader@necel.com To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Matt Mackall , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Development , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Willy Tarreau writes: > I don't know if x86_64 is LP64 or LLP64 on Linux, but at least my alpha > and sparc64 are LP64, so is another PPC64 I use for code validation. > LPC64 is the recommended model for easier 32 to 64 portability (where > ints are 32 ; long, longlong, ptrs are 64). Are there _any_ (widespread) platforms except Windows that use LLP64? LP64 seems to be by far the most common in the unix world. -miles -- "1971 pickup truck; will trade for guns"