From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
Cc: ridong.chen@linux.dev, tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
mkoutny@suse.com, shuah@kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Fix missing effective_xcpus accounting of child partitions
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 11:30:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c00f13e5-d048-4d5d-98ea-984ea7ebc13b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261027123837.100909-1-guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
On 10/27/26 8:38 AM, Guopeng Zhang wrote:
> From: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
>
> When a partition root expands its exclusive CPUs, a valid child
> partition will be able to claim more CPUs from its parent. As
> update_cpumasks_hier() always updates a cpuset before its descendants,
> the parent has already been committed when the child partition is
> reached. Its effective_cpus is computed with the child's old
> effective_xcpus subtracted and no further adjustment is made
> after the child commits its new effective_xcpus.
>
> The additional CPUs are thus granted to both the parent and the child
> partitions. generate_sched_domains() then emits the warning below
> about the overlapping sched domains:
>
> WARNING: kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:919 at rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x1ec/0x2e0, CPU#21: bash/1225
>
> Fix that by taking the CPUs newly added to a valid child partition
> away from its parent at the commit point of update_cpumasks_hier()
> right before the new effective_xcpus is committed. The tasks in the
> parent cpuset as well as its other children will be updated if its
> effective_cpus is changed.
>
> A new test case is added to test_cpuset_prs.sh to test this patch.
>
> Fixes: e2ffe502ba45 ("cgroup/cpuset: Add cpuset.cpus.exclusive for v2")
> Signed-off-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
Thanks for reporting this bug. Yes, the current code doesn't handle
expansion of parent effective_xcpus correctly. I would prefer to handle
it inside update_parent_effective_cpumask() and try to minimize
partition related changes in update_cpumasks_hier(). I have posted an
alternative patch for your review. Let me know how you think about it.
Thanks,
Longman
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh | 4 +++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 3219f927c35e..ec0ef3ad0726 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -2241,6 +2241,7 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp,
> struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cp);
> bool remote = is_remote_partition(cp);
> bool update_parent = false;
> + bool xcpus_added = false;
>
> old_prs = new_prs = cp->partition_root_state;
>
> @@ -2356,6 +2357,19 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp,
> }
>
> spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
> + /*
> + * A child partition may claim more CPUs when its parent expands
> + * the exclusive CPUs. Take the newly granted CPUs away from the
> + * parent which was committed earlier in this walk.
> + */
> + if (!remote && new_prs > 0) {
> + compute_excpus(cp, tmp->addmask);
> + if (cpumask_andnot(tmp->delmask, tmp->addmask,
> + cp->effective_xcpus)) {
> + partition_xcpus_add(new_prs, parent, tmp->delmask);
> + xcpus_added = true;
> + }
> + }
> cpumask_copy(cp->effective_cpus, tmp->new_cpus);
> cp->partition_root_state = new_prs;
> /*
> @@ -2375,6 +2389,17 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp,
>
> cpuset_update_tasks_cpumask(cp, tmp->new_cpus);
>
> + /*
> + * The parent's effective_cpus may have been changed by
> + * partition_xcpus_add() above. Update the tasks in the parent
> + * cpuset and its other children, if necessary.
> + */
> + if (xcpus_added) {
> + cpumask_copy(tmp->addmask, parent->effective_cpus);
> + cpuset_update_tasks_cpumask(parent, tmp->addmask);
> + update_sibling_cpumasks(parent, cp, tmp);
> + }
> +
> /*
> * On default hierarchy, inherit the CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE
> * from parent if current cpuset isn't a valid partition root
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> index 83ef6c781af3..09e430570815 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> @@ -437,6 +437,10 @@ TEST_MATRIX=(
> " CX1-4:P1 CX3-4:P1 . . X1-2 . . . 0 A1:1-2|A2:1-2|XA2: A1:P1|A2:P-1"
> " CX1-4:P1 CX3-4:P1 . . X1-2:X1-4 . . . 0 A1:1-2|A2:3-4|XA2:3-4 A1:P1|A2:P1"
>
> + # The extra CPUs gained by a child partition when its parent expands the
> + # exclusive CPUs have to be taken away from the parent.
> + " C2-6:X2-5:P1 C3-6:X3-6:P1 . . X2-6 . . . 0 A1:2|A2:3-6|XA2:3-6 A1:P1|A2:P1 ."
> +
> # Taking away all CPUs from parent or itself if there are tasks
> # will make the partition invalid.
> " C2-3:P1 C3:P1 . . T C2-3 . . 0 A1:2-3|A2:2-3 A1:P1|A2:P-1"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 12:38 [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Fix missing effective_xcpus accounting of child partitions Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-27 13:44 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-28 5:51 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-28 15:30 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2026-10-29 1:52 ` Guopeng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c00f13e5-d048-4d5d-98ea-984ea7ebc13b@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.