From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/ltphy: Fix SSC Enablement bit in PORT_CLOCK_CTL
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 08:20:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c06a8652-7fc3-4a03-9acc-32b56a562898@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701091503.1302226-3-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
On 7/1/2026 2:45 PM, Suraj Kandpal wrote:
> According to Bspec we only need to write SSC Enable PLL A bit
> and leave PLL B bit alone in PORT_CLOCK_CTL Register.
>
> Fixes: 3383ba2479f7 ("drm/i915/ltphy: Enable SSC during port clock programming")
Checks out with Bspec: 74667, 74492
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lt_phy.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lt_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lt_phy.c
> index 956181f80d35..8fc6d230493f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lt_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lt_phy.c
> @@ -1223,11 +1223,7 @@ intel_lt_phy_program_port_clock_ctl(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> else
> val |= XELPDP_DDI_CLOCK_SELECT_PREP(display, XELPDP_DDI_CLOCK_SELECT_MAXPCLK);
>
> - /* DP2.0 10G and 20G rates enable MPLLA*/
> - if (port_clock == 1000000 || port_clock == 2000000)
> - val |= XELPDP_SSC_ENABLE_PLLA;
> - else
> - val |= ltpll->ssc_enabled ? XELPDP_SSC_ENABLE_PLLB : 0;
> + val |= ltpll->ssc_enabled ? XELPDP_SSC_ENABLE_PLLA : 0;
>
> intel_de_rmw(display, XELPDP_PORT_CLOCK_CTL(display, encoder->port),
> XELPDP_LANE1_PHY_CLOCK_SELECT | XELPDP_FORWARD_CLOCK_UNGATE |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 9:15 [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix LT PHY related SSC writes Suraj Kandpal
2026-07-01 9:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915/ltphy: Readout ssc_enabled for LT PHY Suraj Kandpal
2026-07-02 2:51 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-07-01 9:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/ltphy: Fix SSC Enablement bit in PORT_CLOCK_CTL Suraj Kandpal
2026-07-02 2:50 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2026-07-01 10:06 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Fix LT PHY related SSC writes (rev2) Patchwork
2026-07-01 11:04 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-07-01 12:09 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-07-02 0:39 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2026-07-02 2:30 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c06a8652-7fc3-4a03-9acc-32b56a562898@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.