From: "Shankar, Uma" <uma.shankar@intel.com>
To: "Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/mst: abstract intel_dp_ack_sink_irq_esi()
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 10:28:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0a48445d9c84a7cb644f392699c9028@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1049e7188a76c421fab7797b5c4a6aa1b709f4c9.1641317930.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Jani Nikula
> Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 11:10 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/mst: abstract intel_dp_ack_sink_irq_esi()
>
> Smaller functions make the thing easier to read. Debug log failures to ack.
>
> Note: Looks like we have the retry loop simply because of hysterical raisins, dating
Nit: Typo in reasons.
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
> back to the original DP MST enabling. Keep it, though I have no idea why we have it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 357c39e09bf6..ebf80a875a41 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -2820,6 +2820,19 @@ intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8
> *sink_irq_vector)
> DP_DPRX_ESI_LEN;
> }
>
> +static bool intel_dp_ack_sink_irq_esi(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8
> +esi[4]) {
> + int retry;
> +
> + for (retry = 0; retry < 3; retry++) {
> + if (drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SINK_COUNT_ESI + 1,
> + &esi[1], 3) == 3)
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> bool
> intel_dp_needs_vsc_sdp(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> const struct drm_connector_state *conn_state) @@ -3660,7
> +3673,6 @@ intel_dp_check_mst_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> */
> u8 esi[DP_DPRX_ESI_LEN+2] = {};
> bool handled;
> - int retry;
>
> if (!intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(intel_dp, esi)) {
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> @@ -3685,15 +3697,8 @@ intel_dp_check_mst_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> if (!handled)
> break;
>
> - for (retry = 0; retry < 3; retry++) {
> - int wret;
> -
> - wret = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux,
> - DP_SINK_COUNT_ESI+1,
> - &esi[1], 3);
> - if (wret == 3)
> - break;
> - }
> + if (!intel_dp_ack_sink_irq_esi(intel_dp, esi))
> + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Failed to ack ESI\n");
> }
>
> return link_ok;
> --
> 2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-20 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-04 17:39 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915/mst: DP MST ESI handling improvements Jani Nikula
2022-01-04 17:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/mst: fix intel_dp_mst_hpd_irq() indentation Jani Nikula
2022-01-20 10:24 ` Shankar, Uma
2022-01-04 17:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/mst: abstract intel_dp_ack_sink_irq_esi() Jani Nikula
2022-01-20 10:28 ` Shankar, Uma [this message]
2022-01-20 10:32 ` Jani Nikula
2022-01-20 10:35 ` Shankar, Uma
2022-01-04 17:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/mst: debug log 4 bytes of ESI right after reading Jani Nikula
2022-01-04 17:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/mst: abstract handling of link status in DP MST Jani Nikula
2022-01-04 17:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/mst: read link status only when requested by sink in ESI Jani Nikula
2022-01-04 17:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/mst: ack sink irq ESI for link status changes Jani Nikula
2022-01-04 17:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/mst: only ack the ESI we actually handled Jani Nikula
2022-01-20 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
2022-01-04 19:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/mst: DP MST ESI handling improvements Patchwork
2022-01-04 20:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-01-20 11:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/mst: DP MST ESI handling improvements (rev2) Patchwork
2022-01-20 13:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c0a48445d9c84a7cb644f392699c9028@intel.com \
--to=uma.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.