From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Lu Wang <wanglu.priv@gmail.com>, yu.c.chen@intel.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chen.yu@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/cache: honor migrate_llc_task semantics in active load balance
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 17:10:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c20b86364a54bf148a0372c3b68628e28bacf0cd.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803100227.2585560-1-wanglu.priv@gmail.com>
On Mon, 2026-08-03 at 18:02 +0800, Lu Wang wrote:
> Thanks for the review, Chenyu.
>
> I got interested in CAS because it strikes a good balance between
> generic CFS load balancing and strict LLC/CPU affinity.
>
> My understanding is that migrate_llc_task encodes the target
> direction of the balance pass, not just "ALB was triggered by CAS".
> alb_break_llc() only vetoes ALB when every task on src_rq prefers
> staying put (nr_pref_llc_running == cfs.h_nr_runnable); once tasks
> have mixed preferences it lets ALB through without checking which
> one gets picked. active_load_balance_cpu_stop() then walks
> src_rq->cfs_tasks in reverse and takes the first task accepted by
> can_migrate_task() — with multiple tasks on src_rq, that's not
> necessarily the one whose preferred_llc matches the destination.
>
> My patch threads migration_type through to the stopper and, only
> for migrate_llc_task, rejects a candidate whose preferred_llc
> doesn't match the destination LLC.
>
> Regarding:
> > this helps the case where the task is the only running one on the
> > src_cpu
>
> If that single task already prefers the destination LLC, my check
> still returns true, so this case is unaffected. The disagreement is
> really about what happens when it does not prefer the destination.
> That comes down to how we read the semantics of migrate_llc_task:
>
> (a) "migrate a task toward the destination LLC selected by
> calculate_imbalance()", or
> (b) "this ALB was triggered by CAS's LLC-balance logic, so any
> generally-eligible task on src_rq may be pushed"
The policy of when to break LLC preference locality whether it is in regular
load balance or in active load balance are both encoded in
can_migrate_llc(). Sometimes when an LLC is overloaded, you may
want to move the task off its preferred LLC. Moving a task off its
preferred LLC is not always wrong. Looks like you patch
stop that with migrate_llc_task_wrong_dst().
There is a comment section above can_migrate_llc() to
explain the policy details.
Tim
>
> If (a), the per-task check is needed.
>
> Happy to discuss further.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-01 12:22 [PATCH] sched/cache: honor migrate_llc_task semantics in active load balance Lu Wang
2026-08-03 4:20 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-08-03 10:02 ` Lu Wang
2026-08-04 0:10 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2026-08-04 8:17 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-08-04 15:07 ` Lu Wang
2026-08-04 19:42 ` Tim Chen
2026-08-05 2:38 ` wanglu15
2026-08-05 16:04 ` Tim Chen
2026-08-05 16:43 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-08-06 16:21 ` Tim Chen
2026-08-04 8:30 ` Lu Wang
2026-08-06 15:35 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-08-06 17:22 ` Tim Chen
2026-08-07 6:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-08-07 9:58 ` Lu Wang
2026-08-09 10:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Lu Wang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-01 12:17 [PATCH] " Lu Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c20b86364a54bf148a0372c3b68628e28bacf0cd.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chen.yu@linux.dev \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wanglu.priv@gmail.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.