From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 92075E00CCB; Sat, 8 Oct 2016 15:08:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [96.127.176.250 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Greylist: delayed 973 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at yocto-www; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 15:08:36 PDT Received: from delivery.mailspamprotection.com (delivery.mailspamprotection.com [96.127.176.250]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B94E00752 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2016 15:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.siteground282.com ([184.154.233.8] helo=siteground282.com) by se3.mailspamprotection.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bszXY-0003WJ-77 for yocto@yoctoproject.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 16:52:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=reliableembeddedsystems.com; s=dkim; h=Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=QAVEsJsGOnwC7A8ia5KwrLfNnnzr6glynJFpS2KAQ5U=; b=LHjd648g7vsWan99akhdVeaIt d2LZD/jytKKr2ooyICIctldNTxyMyfSMHo11/GZ9EE0RTtsyKVzSgUK+8RrM4s+FoTLfQAFKlS4/Y CtKOh9iZXiP7JbxxRZ8WX1Pt/W+ZuHYHnZtY4LOh2q7K/+qVTqSbBo251LfNxWjO9UNyk=; Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=54998 helo=secure282.sgcpanel.com) by siteground282.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bszXX-0006W9-W2; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 16:52:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 16:52:19 -0500 From: gmane@reliableembeddedsystems.com To: Bill Randle In-Reply-To: References: <56993190d475014fd9f289fdad7db19e@reliableembeddedsystems.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: gmane@reliableembeddedsystems.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.4 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - siteground282.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - yoctoproject.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - reliableembeddedsystems.com X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIWEcM0d9a2K3OcfFeaASvaIT05e+4t99MpEggFbXzbnhttgCKkcBtGCa +yWmGXl+/0OdHUzGyIWSzveO/M+HlaVWShQ0+uJXiDSCp280tJFsbX/3TQnYbqlNHxpi9XBHG8Jz 8WfReHqUOdh1n/PPcFwX6JG8lzqVscQusn/Xjs+jOP3Bov002FW3lqzBmHWSyFz1pRXWhjh9fdbl 44I0Df1bDJmuEytGOjhN7+VkHzjLSbBIxrv0tc9XqsVkeAX6S7iXkMXDFHgBzeWjk6Zbtb6ZULs/ x/wiY4bOQVH/H0QQPBfyCUQPGRfAuQJyQcUhQ4/Ia6YN5m0MsQWfYUYaa1Lo0EEGTh9WNZgruaGG pyvdI7qaN8yfURviR8OTeMmKUqzo7AcUqNzrkO1kQ1IW8ac6xxrycw2ScA+2hbCxTNV1lHIbmw+x cBDSXBmIVsiBPGIW1l+d5u2ITozWClL6/rEu//nzk76lak4ojODbJHHE/Dw6ORF2hyiPywks80fx SU3VhpzTalbJG9pSL0Hyv/WnnxF0rh7QmTz7opAw1zOCx6AoM/sstGqwASJuN0ZI7b8iwtW8U0pO aiKgha0BgqbI0WkU2DaIvSyZINaqxL7/6J1fhOzjF0b4LXcjJZ5lohuhT13Bj8VNLHfZatRVqMdk DSi+R1QeWHGeD/ozkhX48xvhmpkqK6lzdXhhHwmzyvpmzdQjXE961MSkPADU05Y= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine1.mailspamprotection.com X-Originating-IP: 184.154.233.8 X-SpamExperts-Domain: siteground282.com X-SpamExperts-Username: 184.154.233.8 Authentication-Results: mailspamprotection.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=184.154.233.8@siteground282.com X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.10) X-Recommended-Action: accept Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Y-AB PublishArtifacts toolchain wrong dir X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 22:08:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On 2016-10-08 09:28, Bill Randle wrote: > > All the "standard" build configs produce both x86 and x86_64 > toolchains - which makes sense, since it's not known what build host > the user is using and the AB needs to show both are buildable. In your > case, you know you have an x86_64 machine and don't want to bother > building for x86, so, it's seems like the thing to do is check for the > existence of a build package (x86 or x86_64) before attempting the > copy. > That's what I thought as well at first. So I introduced new toolchain artifacts like toolchain_x86_64 and toolchain_i686 where I did only the relevant thing in the relevant branch. It did not solve my problem. Regards, Robert