From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5606F8D74F for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2026 14:13:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.1283504.1565705 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1wDNSu-0002d5-CN; Thu, 16 Apr 2026 14:13:08 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 1283504.1565705; Thu, 16 Apr 2026 14:13:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1wDNSu-0002cy-8g; Thu, 16 Apr 2026 14:13:08 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 1283504; Thu, 16 Apr 2026 14:13:06 +0000 Received: from mx.expurgate.net ([195.190.135.10]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1wDNSs-0002cs-CV for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2026 14:13:06 +0000 Received: from mx.expurgate.net (helo=localhost) by mx.expurgate.net with esmtp id 1wDNSr-006Jyc-Ov for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2026 16:13:05 +0200 Received: from [10.42.69.2] (helo=localhost) by localhost with ESMTP (eXpurgate MTA 0.9.1) (envelope-from ) id 69e0ee60-5cb7-0a2a0a5109dd-0a2a4502e9cc-44 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2026 16:13:05 +0200 Received: from [209.85.128.45] (helo=mail-wm1-f45.google.com) by tlsNG-720697.mxtls.expurgate.net with ESMTPS (eXpurgate 4.56.1) (envelope-from ) id 69e0ee71-af86-0a2a45020019-d155802da5db-3 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2026 16:13:05 +0200 Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-488b8efed61so8047565e9.1 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2026 07:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.156.60.236] (ip-037-024-206-209.um08.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [37.24.206.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-488f5854097sm70120335e9.12.2026.04.16.07.13.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Apr 2026 07:13:04 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" Authentication-Results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1776348785; x=1776953585; darn=lists.xenproject.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:autocrypt:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZzUUXXRoDU6tftKcXP8t9hoi8AcEty1Tp+a1C4WlHvI=; b=ZHnR7d8KKcRIDy8AR1XmTFYHV995CEoCEAbKZcUGT7+GDr+oEhQgYnYw7+uGQNhGrI 4Qc49iX4bndjtnQnf9E96V2JPc7hgN/fkcxYz/lFyEcOzCkefey8uWMP0oUhYplgBAXl gpn2IxxOmfdKYIIZvZOhGTPB9TprXPeLzo7v8Z3MMn0S1XJ2g6Ca3vUona+v5d6fVUCL qS8Xu6Gwdt6cbe1uspBw1pG+5vXyt90cvJAflJFE/fTBDQUVkXQ9q4mwb3UjToRVkrNx Qzadn+5zo4RspfFjUvWFnk5ce0hWHp8PG97OjxRd4xJG1EzOy+ht/z93jNrmFfBLotqX xhHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1776348785; x=1776953585; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:autocrypt:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ZzUUXXRoDU6tftKcXP8t9hoi8AcEty1Tp+a1C4WlHvI=; b=h1h6bM7ZKYVD+dGPIpsCEdvq2mk1wb3OaWyAxe087docdCAVDYECXwm6bOO08iiCpQ ywweuoX18STGmaEDnTmVT5xpHERpbwwjXHBw/SkMBt9ePZvYAoH0+/jUoEk/Bz/98O/p G/FVbKOnK6xGKHR/VUmKEKQPStmjWJyH9OBfl0Cy9rOMkPAjrvO20IhPRc6IbwUoLIn2 ppsrKJeNlVp34Z1BYw8vzkXiWWiaLxrAJX8eNXgpWzbh209zuKP+W9weOWekPreAETpk W0AsS97y8Z66M0nISa47FsW6P3ngmqJePs58JJGTP77wN8KyOS7goYuISLRVBea5Dest QVAg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ9xvv3Z1/XjsbpToXRMT0I7JV7R0dK1EkisLA8tYynkqFwSJ5xPwtEa0Uy8pjps3oc35xEj0kf8Hig=@lists.xenproject.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw2mIHY3LC/qfNu12X+PwcAqq5OqrYJfxLKrIemtuFHs7gTRU/V da2V6901W9MLu28HIrXy6lU13wr1Vs7wqRwAvxXlKj4q4QM58ErBvoFmGVodvu/RKw== X-Gm-Gg: AeBDiet5s8VRmvwGlvcXRdGcM+9zPjmjTM0k3as/+yGYRfqfuCNvhS0pusscsaIkAXw SicWKGa1Bar+LJy+kAf8BZTbzLcChrb+bKZmvlPvTRUkQpZFUuK/x9m+tWfSK7DeomzFxGoenRW iXAWU13mgGMHJGXI8fpY5sfoaFZbl70uqhmYC6e+CJK+9rQDtltYoQboiUduohR7Eapy278eUvb caTfzRmqjOvCG85D144oeeHaQBNZv93FwhoFQa+xGeUsOluAt3vwvbxBv4ElPDxkDZB0HNNq3NK K5D08TbYKq/b9Jb42dMm9oRR4m1CTSSI/L/mMhnEe4vyTgN/MTi3qskkKWVfdTCMaCmrLTbEpr0 0BU4H+oVgaNVGRXE+CxkU107xo1Tampn+Nvf8dau8rtApubA4d5bK2JAz7+huBzvndAtbrOd/aH AsoBBhI0ZUBZQXgthFW+BgW0Ii4XXMxGTMQCDhxw/eWE7ukYHeaHlW7u9TVDbRBO40/RCOJxsB/ nHUIi4jRywClWRKc8Iz/sZPoHm/u5COobGN X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:8b84:b0:488:aa33:dc8f with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-488f458cfbbmr54305595e9.0.1776348784899; Thu, 16 Apr 2026 07:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 16:13:07 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 27/27] xen/riscv: add initial dom0less infrastructure support To: Oleksii Kurochko Cc: Romain Caritey , Alistair Francis , Connor Davis , Andrew Cooper , Anthony PERARD , Michal Orzel , Julien Grall , =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=C3=A9?= , Stefano Stabellini , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org References: <79c69067-4771-40df-a52b-8b552cd92a00@suse.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Jan Beulich Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@suse.com; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-purgate-ID: tlsNG-720697/1776348785-80979161-D1FD231B/0/0 X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate-size: 1142 On 15.04.2026 12:00, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > On 4/7/26 4:11 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 10.03.2026 18:09, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: >>> --- >>> Open questions: >>> - Shouldn't declaration/defintion of max_init_domid move to common code >>> instead of having it for each architecture separately? If yes, then what >>> would be the best place. >> >> What would you use to decide whether the declaration or #define is >> needed? (Plausible headers to put it can surely be found: console.h, >> domain.h, and perhaps more.) > > I thought about to wrap that with CONFIG_DOM0LESS_BOOT as the > declaration is needed only for this case, for all other cases it is just > #define. > > Or as an option we could always use declaration all the time. It won't > increase size of Xen too much or decrease performance because of > variable access. Just to mention - unless coming with very good justification, I for one am opposed to using variables for compile-time constants. We avoid doing so in a number of situations, so deliberately introducing a case to the contrary would at least feel inconsistent. Jan