From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [66.249.82.234] (helo=wx-out-0506.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IQV01-0005io-Ss for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:22:54 +0200 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h27so307425wxd for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:21:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.98.3 with SMTP id v3mr3135957agb.1188422465297; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:21:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.50.8 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:21:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:21:05 +0200 From: "Leon Woestenberg" To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <109919.20070822152350@vanille-media.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1187692103.6234.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46CC3773.8010707@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> <109919.20070822152350@vanille-media.de> Subject: Re: RFC: Upgrade OE.dev to bitbake 1.8.8 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:22:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello, On 8/22/07, Dr. Michael Lauer wrote: > Koen Kooi wrote: > > Richard Purdie schreef: > >> Hi, > >> > >> There are lots of good changes in bitbake 1.8.8. Providing no major > >> issues are found with that bitbake release should we make it the minimum > >> version requirement for OE.dev in say two weeks? Any objections? > > > Let's activate it on 20070904 > Are the OE->bitbake version-dependencies documented or tagged anywhere? If not yet, I would propose to tag the OE repository with a tag like "PRE-BITBAKE-1_8_8" or whatever is supported/desired for mtn/oe. Regards, Leon.