From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9065467A33 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 09:24:40 +1000 (EST) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so559124rnz for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:24:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:24:38 -0800 From: Shawn Jin To: ppcembed Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Header files for 440? Reply-To: Shawn Jin List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, Are there any criteria to define things on so many different header files for 440 family chips? For example, an Ocotea board has the following header files. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. I can understand the reasons why there are ibm44x.h, ibm440gx.h, and ocotea.h. But why do we need to separate ibm44x_common.h from ibm44x.h and ibm440gx.h from ibm440gx_common.h? Can we just simply combine them together? It's a little confusing on what definitions and declarations should be which files. Is there any guildeline saying what header file should be in , , or ? Any explanations? Thanks, -Shawn.