From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Qemu-block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
dgilbert@redhat.com, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: QEMU iotest 267 failure / assertion in migration code
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 18:48:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4677b0e-87eb-beca-d9fb-050c9315d316@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi!
I just ran "make check" in a build directory where I did
not compile qemu-system-x86_64, and got a failure with
iotest 267.
Re-running the "check" script directly got me some more
information:
$ ./check -qcow2 267
QEMU -- "/tmp/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/../../qemu-system-alpha" -nodefaults -display none -accel qtest
QEMU_IMG -- "/tmp/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/../../qemu-img"
QEMU_IO -- "/tmp/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/../../qemu-io" --cache writeback --aio threads -f qcow2
QEMU_NBD -- "/tmp/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/../../qemu-nbd"
IMGFMT -- qcow2
IMGPROTO -- file
PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 thuth 4.18.0-425.3.1.el8.x86_64
TEST_DIR -- /tmp/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch
SOCK_DIR -- /tmp/tmp_qbcjhsu
GDB_OPTIONS --
VALGRIND_QEMU --
PRINT_QEMU_OUTPUT --
267 fail [18:39:41] [18:39:44] 3.5s output mismatch (see /tmp/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/267.out.bad)
--- .../qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/267.out
+++ /tmp/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/267.out.bad
@@ -31,23 +31,23 @@
Testing: -drive driver=IMGFMT,file=TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT,if=none
QEMU X.Y.Z monitor - type 'help' for more information
(qemu) savevm snap0
-(qemu) info snapshots
-List of snapshots present on all disks:
-ID TAG VM SIZE DATE VM CLOCK ICOUNT
--- snap0 SIZE yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss 00:00:00.000
-(qemu) loadvm snap0
-(qemu) quit
+QEMU_PROG: ../../qemu/migration/ram.c:874: pss_find_next_dirty: Assertion `pss->host_page_end' failed.
+./common.rc: line 181: 1903770 Aborted (core dumped) ( if [ -n "${QEMU_NEED_PID}" ]; then
+ echo $BASHPID > "${QEMU_TEST_DIR}/qemu-${_QEMU_HANDLE}.pid";
+fi; GDB=""; if [ -n "${GDB_OPTIONS}" ]; then
+ GDB="gdbserver ${GDB_OPTIONS}";
+fi; VALGRIND_QEMU="${VALGRIND_QEMU_VM}" _qemu_proc_exec "${VALGRIND_LOGFILE}" $GDB "$QEMU_PROG" $QEMU_OPTIONS "$@" )
Looks like this test does not work if the main machine
of the selected QEMU binary does not support migration?
Should we remove this test from the "auto" group?
Anyway, QEMU should also not trigger an assertion, so this
sounds like another bug?
Thomas
next reply other threads:[~2023-01-18 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-18 17:48 Thomas Huth [this message]
2023-01-18 18:02 ` QEMU iotest 267 failure / assertion in migration code Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2023-01-20 12:47 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4677b0e-87eb-beca-d9fb-050c9315d316@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.