From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
"yanjun.zhu@linux.dev" <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/rxe: Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 07:38:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5374d12-84ed-4298-92d3-90062988f68d@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260316201301.GL61385@unreal>
在 2026/3/16 13:13, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 04:40:23PM +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote:
>> This patch continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which has begun
>> with the changes introducing new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag:
>>
>> commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
>> commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
>>
>> The point of the refactoring is to eventually alter the default behavior of
>> workqueues to become unbound by default so that their workload placement is
>> optimized by the scheduler.
>>
>> Before that to happen, workqueue users must be converted to the better named
>> new workqueues with no intended behaviour changes:
>>
>> system_wq -> system_percpu_wq
>> system_unbound_wq -> system_dfl_wq
>>
>> This way the old obsolete workqueues (system_wq, system_unbound_wq) can be
>> removed in the future.
>
> I recall earlier efforts to replace system workqueues with per‑driver queues,
> because unloading a driver forces a flush of the entire system workqueue,
> which is undesirable for overall system behavior.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to introduce a local workqueue here and use that instead?
Thanks.
1.The initialization should be:
my_wq = alloc_workqueue("my_driver_queue", WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
if (!my_wq)
return -ENOMEM;
2. The Submission should be:
queue_work(my_wq, &my_work);
3. Destroy should be:
destroy_workqueue()
Thanks,
Zhu Yanjun
>
> Thanks
>
>>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112003.1dSuoGyc@linutronix.de/
>> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
>> index bc11b1ec59ac..d440c8cbaea5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
>> @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static int rxe_ib_advise_mr_prefetch(struct ib_pd *ibpd,
>> work->frags[i].mr = mr;
>> }
>>
>> - queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &work->work);
>> + queue_work(system_dfl_wq, &work->work);
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>> --
>> 2.53.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 15:40 [PATCH] RDMA/rxe: Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq Marco Crivellari
2026-03-13 17:49 ` yanjun.zhu
2026-03-16 20:13 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-17 14:32 ` Marco Crivellari
2026-03-17 16:24 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-18 8:34 ` Marco Crivellari
2026-03-18 12:20 ` Marco Crivellari
2026-03-18 14:47 ` Zhu Yanjun
2026-03-18 15:02 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-18 15:08 ` Marco Crivellari
2026-03-17 14:38 ` Zhu Yanjun [this message]
2026-03-17 17:24 ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-17 19:03 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-17 19:31 ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-17 20:15 ` Yanjun.Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c5374d12-84ed-4298-92d3-90062988f68d@linux.dev \
--to=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.