From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v3] GTFIFODBG Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:00:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1328778920-5927-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> <20120211162205.GC12283@phenom.ffwll.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207C8A0FCB for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:00:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120211162205.GC12283@phenom.ffwll.local> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Daniel Vetter , Ben Widawsky Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:22:05 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:15:17AM +0100, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > Someday I will get simple patches in one version... Alas that day is not > > today. > > > > Ben Widawsky (3): > > drm/i915: use gtfifodbg > > drm/i915: catch gtfifo errors on forcewake_put > > drm/i915: check gtfifodbg after possibly failed writes > > I've slurped these three in for -next, thanks for the patches. There's a > quibble though from your grumpy maintainer: Please keep a proper patch > revision log in the commit message and don't just drop it randomly. In > this case the r-b (v1) is pretty pointless because you don't say what > you've changed (and that these patches aren't v1) ... Daniel, can you add my reviewed-by to that series? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre