From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Govindapillai, Vinod" <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/5] drm/i915: add pme_enabled() to the parent interface
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 12:38:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5e03bfe62b289eb26198a2bbf89539fbe045792.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915092518.639448-3-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
On Tue, 2026-09-15 at 12:25 +0300, Vinod Govindapillai wrote:
> PME capabiliy need to be assessed very early during runtime suspend
> routine to avoid resetting HPDs during IRQ resets. As display
> runtime pm routines are being executed in the independent intel
> display driver entry points, we need to have independent access
> to the pme status as well. Add a provision to query the optional
> pme_enabled to the parent interface so that it could be called
> independently based on xe/i915's pme_enabled() implementation.
>
> Assisted-by: GitHub_Copilot:claude-opus-5
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c | 7 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h | 1 +
> include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c
> index 0a331f89b4db..9927119a0fd1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,13 @@ bool intel_display_rpm_suspended(struct
> intel_display *display)
> return display->parent->rpm->suspended(display->drm);
> }
>
> +bool intel_display_rpm_pme_enabled(struct intel_display *display)
> +{
> + const struct intel_display_rpm_interface *rpm = display-
> >parent->rpm;
> +
> + return rpm->pme_enabled && rpm->pme_enabled(display->drm);
> +}
> +
> void assert_display_rpm_held(struct intel_display *display)
> {
> display->parent->rpm->assert_held(display->drm);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h
> index 6ef48515f84b..5d9a1cdddfa7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ void intel_display_rpm_put(struct intel_display
> *display, struct ref_tracker *wa
>
> /* Only for special cases. */
> bool intel_display_rpm_suspended(struct intel_display *display);
> +bool intel_display_rpm_pme_enabled(struct intel_display *display);
>
> void assert_display_rpm_held(struct intel_display *display);
> void intel_display_rpm_assert_block(struct intel_display *display);
> diff --git a/include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h
> b/include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h
> index 5e44c022d1ae..f36134e89cb6 100644
> --- a/include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h
> +++ b/include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h
> @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ struct intel_display_rpm_interface {
> void (*put_unchecked)(const struct drm_device *drm);
>
> bool (*suspended)(const struct drm_device *drm);
> + bool (*pme_enabled)(const struct drm_device *drm); /*
> Optional */
> void (*assert_held)(const struct drm_device *drm);
> void (*assert_block)(const struct drm_device *drm);
> void (*assert_unblock)(const struct drm_device *drm);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-15 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-15 9:25 [PATCH v8 0/5] pm_pme support on display hotplug Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-15 9:25 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] drm/xe/pm: introduce PM PME support Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-15 12:27 ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-09-16 14:16 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-15 9:25 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] drm/i915: add pme_enabled() to the parent interface Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-15 12:38 ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2026-09-15 9:25 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] drm/i915/xe: plug the pme_enabed implementation for xe Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-15 12:39 ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-09-15 9:25 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] drm/i915/irq: conditional HPD IRQ resets based on PME capability Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-15 9:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-15 12:55 ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-09-15 9:25 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] drm/i915/hotplug: avoid HPD polling if the device is PME capable Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-15 12:55 ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-09-15 9:34 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for pm_pme support on display hotplug (rev8) Patchwork
2026-09-15 9:50 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2026-09-15 10:11 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2026-09-15 11:01 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-15 12:34 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-09-15 17:10 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c5e03bfe62b289eb26198a2bbf89539fbe045792.camel@intel.com \
--to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=vinod.govindapillai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.