From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/6] ip_frag: drop IPv6 fragments with unexpected headers
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:21:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7a6a466552d488e81f7c9071826cc88@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616210656.464062-5-stephen@networkplumber.org>
> DPDK version of IPv6 reassembly only handles a fragment header placed
> directly after the IPv6 header. With other extension headers in the
> unfragmentable part, ipv6_frag_reassemble() patches the wrong
> next-header field, miscomputes the payload length, and shifts the
> wrong bytes, corrupting the result.
>
> Drop the fragment when l3_len covers more than the IPv6 and fragment
> headers. RFC 8200 allows a receiver to discard packets whose extension
> headers are not in the recommended order, and RFC 9099 recommends
> dropping non-conforming fragmented IPv6 packets, so dropping here is
> permitted rather than a deviation.
>
> Fixes: 4f1a8f633862 ("ip_frag: add IPv6 reassembly")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
> lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c
> index 0e809a01e5..7c1659002b 100644
> --- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c
> +++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c
> @@ -180,6 +180,19 @@ rte_ipv6_frag_reassemble_packet(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl
> *tbl,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Only a fragment header directly following the IPv6 header is
> + * supported. Other extension headers in the unfragmentable part are
> + * not handled: ipv6_frag_reassemble() assumes l3_len covers exactly
> + * the IPv6 and fragment headers when it patches the next-header field
> + * and removes the fragment header. Drop the fragment rather than
> + * produce a corrupt datagram.
> + */
> + if (mb->l3_len != sizeof(struct rte_ipv6_hdr) + sizeof(*frag_hdr)) {
> + IP_FRAG_MBUF2DR(dr, mb);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
Hmm, not sure this is a right thing.
Yes, we don't support properly ipv6 options that are *before* fragment hreader
(so called Per-Fragment Headers), but AFAIR we do support ipv6 options
that come *after* fragment header (Extension headers).
> if (unlikely(trim > 0))
> rte_pktmbuf_trim(mb, trim);
>
> --
> 2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 21:05 [PATCH 0/6] ip_frag: fix reassembly defects and add test Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] ip_frag: tolerate duplicate fragments Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 8:08 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-30 13:32 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] ip_frag: discard datagrams with overlapping fragments Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-19 13:12 ` Morten Brørup
2026-06-19 17:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-22 15:01 ` Morten Brørup
2026-06-22 15:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 8:16 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] ip_frag: include protocol in IPv4 reassembly key Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 8:17 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] ip_frag: drop IPv6 fragments with unexpected headers Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 9:21 ` Konstantin Ananyev [this message]
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] ip_frag: reject oversized reassembled datagrams Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 9:32 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] app/test: add test for IP reassembly Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-19 13:24 ` [PATCH 0/6] ip_frag: fix reassembly defects and add test Morten Brørup
2026-06-22 15:03 ` Morten Brørup
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] " Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] ip_frag: tolerate duplicate fragments Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] ip_frag: discard datagrams with overlapping fragments Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 8:13 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] ip_frag: include protocol in IPv4 reassembly key Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] ip_frag: drop IPv6 fragments with per-fragment headers Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] ip_frag: reject oversized reassembled datagrams Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] app/test: add test for IP reassembly Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] ip_frag: remove use of rte_memcpy Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] doc: add release note about ip_frag changes Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 19:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 8:22 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] ip_frag: fix reassembly defects and add test Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ip_frag: tolerate duplicate fragments Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] ip_frag: discard datagrams with overlapping fragments Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] ip_frag: include protocol in IPv4 reassembly key Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] ip_frag: drop IPv6 fragments with per-fragment headers Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:52 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] ip_frag: reject oversized reassembled datagrams Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] app/test: add test for IP reassembly Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] ip_frag: remove use of rte_memcpy Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:53 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] doc: add release note about ip_frag changes Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:42 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-07-02 20:55 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] ip_frag: fix reassembly defects and add test Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7a6a466552d488e81f7c9071826cc88@huawei.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.