From: "Gupta, Anshuman" <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
To: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/hdcp: Add DP HDCP2.2 timeout to read entire msg
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:07:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8f7e90341524fc4b0e514376214a7e9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1df0c61-9d6e-3a04-d22f-4a2c2a096df0@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nautiyal, Ankit K <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 3:06 PM
> To: Gupta, Anshuman <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>; intel-
> gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/hdcp: Add DP HDCP2.2 timeout to
> read entire msg
>
> Hi Anshuman,
>
> Changes look good to me as per the Errata.
>
> There are minor comments, inline:
Thanks for review, I will address your comment but just need to clarified one thing as below
>
> On 1/27/2021 1:54 PM, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
> > As documented in HDCP 2.2 DP Errata spec transmitter should abort the
> > authentication protocol in case transmitter has not received the
> > entire {AKE_Send_Cert, AKE_Send_H_prime, AKE_Send_Paring_Info} msg
> > within {110,7,5} miliseconds.
> >
> > Adding above msg timeout values and aborting the HDCP authentication
> > in case it timedout to read entire msg.
> >
> > https://www.digital-cp.com/sites/default/files/HDCP%202_2_DisplayPort_
> > Errata_v3_0.pdf
> >
> > Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c | 56 +++++++++++++-------
> > include/drm/drm_hdcp.h | 3 ++
> > 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> > index f372e25edab4..f7cc5cbcabc6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> > @@ -292,39 +292,42 @@ struct hdcp2_dp_msg_data {
> > u8 msg_id;
> > u32 offset;
> > bool msg_detectable;
> > + bool msg_can_timedout;
>
> Perhaps we can just check if msg_read_timedout is not 0 , instead of adding
> bool msg_can_timedout.
>
>
> > u32 timeout;
> > u32 timeout2; /* Added for non_paired situation */
> > + /* Timeout to read entire msg */
> > + u32 msg_read_timeout;
> > };
> >
> > static const struct hdcp2_dp_msg_data hdcp2_dp_msg_data[] = {
> > - { HDCP_2_2_AKE_INIT, DP_HDCP_2_2_AKE_INIT_OFFSET, false, 0, 0 },
> > + { HDCP_2_2_AKE_INIT, DP_HDCP_2_2_AKE_INIT_OFFSET, false, false,
> 0, 0, 0},
> > { HDCP_2_2_AKE_SEND_CERT,
> DP_HDCP_2_2_AKE_SEND_CERT_OFFSET,
> > - false, HDCP_2_2_CERT_TIMEOUT_MS, 0 },
> > + false, true, HDCP_2_2_CERT_TIMEOUT_MS, 0,
> HDCP_2_2_DP_CERT_READ_TIMEOUT_MS},
> > { HDCP_2_2_AKE_NO_STORED_KM,
> DP_HDCP_2_2_AKE_NO_STORED_KM_OFFSET,
> > - false, 0, 0 },
> > + false, false, 0, 0, 0 },
> > { HDCP_2_2_AKE_STORED_KM,
> DP_HDCP_2_2_AKE_STORED_KM_OFFSET,
> > - false, 0, 0 },
> > + false, false, 0, 0, 0 },
> > { HDCP_2_2_AKE_SEND_HPRIME,
> DP_HDCP_2_2_AKE_SEND_HPRIME_OFFSET,
> > - true, HDCP_2_2_HPRIME_PAIRED_TIMEOUT_MS,
> > - HDCP_2_2_HPRIME_NO_PAIRED_TIMEOUT_MS },
> > + true, true, HDCP_2_2_HPRIME_PAIRED_TIMEOUT_MS,
> > + HDCP_2_2_HPRIME_NO_PAIRED_TIMEOUT_MS,
> HDCP_2_2_DP_HPRIME_READ_TIMEOUT_MS},
> > { HDCP_2_2_AKE_SEND_PAIRING_INFO,
> > - DP_HDCP_2_2_AKE_SEND_PAIRING_INFO_OFFSET, true,
> > - HDCP_2_2_PAIRING_TIMEOUT_MS, 0 },
> > - { HDCP_2_2_LC_INIT, DP_HDCP_2_2_LC_INIT_OFFSET, false, 0, 0 },
> > + DP_HDCP_2_2_AKE_SEND_PAIRING_INFO_OFFSET, true, true,
> > + HDCP_2_2_PAIRING_TIMEOUT_MS, 0,
> HDCP_2_2_DP_PAIRING_READ_TIMEOUT_MS },
> > + { HDCP_2_2_LC_INIT, DP_HDCP_2_2_LC_INIT_OFFSET, false, false, 0, 0,
> 0 },
> > { HDCP_2_2_LC_SEND_LPRIME,
> DP_HDCP_2_2_LC_SEND_LPRIME_OFFSET,
> > - false, HDCP_2_2_DP_LPRIME_TIMEOUT_MS, 0 },
> > - { HDCP_2_2_SKE_SEND_EKS, DP_HDCP_2_2_SKE_SEND_EKS_OFFSET,
> false,
> > - 0, 0 },
> > + false, false, HDCP_2_2_DP_LPRIME_TIMEOUT_MS, 0, 0 },
> > + { HDCP_2_2_SKE_SEND_EKS, DP_HDCP_2_2_SKE_SEND_EKS_OFFSET,
> false, false,
> > + 0, 0, 0 },
> > { HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_RECVID_LIST,
> > - DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_RECVID_LIST_OFFSET, true,
> > - HDCP_2_2_RECVID_LIST_TIMEOUT_MS, 0 },
> > - { HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_ACK, DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_ACK_OFFSET,
> false,
> > - 0, 0 },
> > + DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_RECVID_LIST_OFFSET, true, false,
> > + HDCP_2_2_RECVID_LIST_TIMEOUT_MS, 0, 0 },
> > + { HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_ACK, DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_ACK_OFFSET,
> false, false,
> > + 0, 0, 0 },
> > { HDCP_2_2_REP_STREAM_MANAGE,
> > - DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_STREAM_MANAGE_OFFSET, false,
> > - 0, 0 },
> > + DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_STREAM_MANAGE_OFFSET, false, false,
> > + 0, 0, 0},
> > { HDCP_2_2_REP_STREAM_READY,
> DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_STREAM_READY_OFFSET,
> > - false, HDCP_2_2_STREAM_READY_TIMEOUT_MS, 0 },
> > + false, false, HDCP_2_2_STREAM_READY_TIMEOUT_MS, 0, 0 },
> > /* local define to shovel this through the write_2_2 interface */
> > #define HDCP_2_2_ERRATA_DP_STREAM_TYPE 50
> > { HDCP_2_2_ERRATA_DP_STREAM_TYPE,
> > @@ -513,6 +516,8 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg(struct intel_digital_port
> *dig_port,
> > u8 *byte = buf;
> > ssize_t ret, bytes_to_recv, len;
> > const struct hdcp2_dp_msg_data *hdcp2_msg_data;
> > + ktime_t msg_end;
> > + bool msg_expired;
> >
> > hdcp2_msg_data = get_hdcp2_dp_msg_data(msg_id);
> > if (!hdcp2_msg_data)
> > @@ -539,6 +544,11 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg(struct
> intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> > len = bytes_to_recv > DP_AUX_MAX_PAYLOAD_BYTES ?
> > DP_AUX_MAX_PAYLOAD_BYTES : bytes_to_recv;
> >
> > + /* Entire msg read timeout since initiate of msg read */
> > + if (bytes_to_recv == size - 1)
>
>
> IMHO, we can add the check if msg_read_timeout > 0, so as to skip for
> messages that do not have timeout requirement.
Above condition is to tick the timeout only when msg is initiated.
Sometimes we can only send DP_AUX_MAX_PAYLOAD_BYTES at a time.
So we can't add msg_read_timeout > 0 here, that will be true in case of
We are sending more then DP_AUX_MAX_PAYLOAD_BYTES Over link.
Br,
Anshuman.
>
>
> > + msg_end = ktime_add_ms(ktime_get_raw(),
> > + hdcp2_msg_data-
> >msg_read_timeout);
> > +
> > ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&dig_port->dp.aux, offset,
> > (void *)byte, len);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > @@ -551,6 +561,14 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg(struct
> intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> > byte += ret;
> > offset += ret;
> > }
> > +
> > + msg_expired = ktime_after(ktime_get_raw(), msg_end);
> > + if (msg_expired && hdcp2_msg_data->msg_can_timedout) {
>
> As mentioned before, we can use msg_read_timeout here.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ankit
>
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "msg_id %d, entire msg read
> timeout(mSec): %d\n",
> > + msg_id, hdcp2_msg_data->msg_read_timeout);
> > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > + }
> > +
> > byte = buf;
> > *byte = msg_id;
> >
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_hdcp.h b/include/drm/drm_hdcp.h
> > index ac22c246542a..2b165a0f434f 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_hdcp.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_hdcp.h
> > @@ -224,9 +224,12 @@ struct hdcp2_rep_stream_ready {
> >
> > /* HDCP2.2 TIMEOUTs in mSec */
> > #define HDCP_2_2_CERT_TIMEOUT_MS 100
> > +#define HDCP_2_2_DP_CERT_READ_TIMEOUT_MS 110
> > #define HDCP_2_2_HPRIME_NO_PAIRED_TIMEOUT_MS 1000
> > #define HDCP_2_2_HPRIME_PAIRED_TIMEOUT_MS 200
> > +#define HDCP_2_2_DP_HPRIME_READ_TIMEOUT_MS 7
> > #define HDCP_2_2_PAIRING_TIMEOUT_MS 200
> > +#define HDCP_2_2_DP_PAIRING_READ_TIMEOUT_MS 5
> > #define HDCP_2_2_HDMI_LPRIME_TIMEOUT_MS 20
> > #define HDCP_2_2_DP_LPRIME_TIMEOUT_MS 7
> > #define HDCP_2_2_RECVID_LIST_TIMEOUT_MS 3000
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-24 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-27 8:24 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] HDCP 2.2 DP errata Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-27 8:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/hdcp: Add DP HDCP2.2 timeout to read entire msg Anshuman Gupta
2021-03-24 9:35 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2021-03-24 10:07 ` Gupta, Anshuman [this message]
2021-01-27 8:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/hdcp: DP HDCP2.2 errata LC_Send_L_Prime=16 Anshuman Gupta
2021-03-24 4:45 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2021-03-24 5:05 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-03-24 5:05 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-27 12:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for HDCP 2.2 DP errata Patchwork
2021-01-27 12:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-01-27 14:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c8f7e90341524fc4b0e514376214a7e9@intel.com \
--to=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.