From: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] arm64: debug: call step handlers statically
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 17:02:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c91901c9-b443-429d-acbf-558322ce152b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250520153558.GC18901@willie-the-truck>
On 20/05/2025 16:35, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 06:43:18PM +0100, Ada Couprie Diaz wrote:
>> +#if CONFIG_UPROBES
> nit: this should be #ifdef and my compiler complains about that:
>
> | arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c:172:5: warning: 'CONFIG_UPROBES' is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Wundef]
Indeed, that's my bad.
Replacing it in v3 with an #ifndef for the stand-in.
>> + return uprobe_singlestep_handler(regs, esr);
>> +#else
>> + return DBG_HOOK_ERROR;
>> +#endif
> It would probably be cleaner to have a static inline definition of
> uprobe_singlestep_handler() when !CONFIG_UPROBES that just returns
> DBG_HOOK_ERROR.
>
>> }
>>
>> - return retval;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KGDB
>> + return kgdb_singlestep_handler(regs, esr);
>> +#else
>> + return DBG_HOOK_ERROR;
>> +#endif
> Similarly here.
That's fair, it does make the function itself very clear !
Replaced the #ifdefs in the function with static inline stand-ins
when the configs are disabled for v3.
> Will
Thanks,
Ada
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-28 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-12 17:43 [PATCH v2 00/11] arm64: debug: remove hook registration, split exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] arm64: debug: clean up single_step_handler logic Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:35 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] arm64: debug: call software break handlers statically Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:35 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-02 16:39 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] arm64: debug: call step " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:35 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-28 16:02 ` Ada Couprie Diaz [this message]
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] arm64: debug: remove break/step handler registration infrastructure Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:36 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] arm64: entry: Add entry and exit functions for debug exceptions Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:36 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-28 14:08 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-29 10:11 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] arm64: debug: split hardware breakpoint exeception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:36 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-28 15:17 ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-28 16:10 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] arm64: debug: split single stepping exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 16:29 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-28 15:22 ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-29 10:10 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-29 10:48 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] arm64: debug: split hardware watchpoint " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 16:59 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-28 13:47 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-28 15:42 ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-29 10:13 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] arm64: debug: split brk64 " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] arm64: debug: split bkpt32 " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-21 9:07 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-29 10:43 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] arm64: debug: remove debug exception registration infrastructure Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-21 9:38 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-28 16:41 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-29 10:15 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-13 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] arm64: debug: remove hook registration, split exception entry Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2025-05-13 15:19 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-16 11:57 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2025-05-28 10:38 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-03 16:10 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c91901c9-b443-429d-acbf-558322ce152b@arm.com \
--to=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.