All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt McKinnon <matt@techsquare.com>
To: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs-transacti hammering the system
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:31:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c9e5ef0a-e60b-b892-272c-1594d47f0657@techsquare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b52265f9-2703-7f25-b1b9-6e84bc7db62e@mendix.com>

Sorry, I missed your in-line reply:


> 1) The one right above, btrfs_write_out_cache, is the write-out of the
> free space cache v1. Do you see this for multiple seconds going on, and
> does it match the time when it's writing X MB/s to disk?
> 

It seems to only last until the next watch update.

[<ffffffffaa0a8406>] io_schedule+0x16/0x40
[<ffffffffaa3b3cde>] get_request+0x23e/0x720
[<ffffffffaa3b6861>] blk_queue_bio+0xc1/0x3a0
[<ffffffffaa3b4a88>] generic_make_request+0xf8/0x2a0
[<ffffffffaa3b4ca5>] submit_bio+0x75/0x150
[<ffffffffc087fac5>] btrfs_map_bio+0xe5/0x2f0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffc084834c>] btree_submit_bio_hook+0x8c/0xe0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffc086f1e3>] submit_one_bio+0x63/0xa0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffc086f39b>] flush_epd_write_bio+0x3b/0x50 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffc086f3be>] flush_write_bio+0xe/0x10 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffc08777a9>] btree_write_cache_pages+0x379/0x450 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffc08478ed>] btree_writepages+0x5d/0x70 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffaa1a326c>] do_writepages+0x1c/0x70
[<ffffffffaa196f2a>] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xaa/0xe0
[<ffffffffaa197023>] filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x13/0x20
[<ffffffffc084fba9>] btrfs_write_marked_extents+0xe9/0x110 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffc084fc4d>] btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction.isra.22+0x3d/0x80 
[btrfs]
[<ffffffffc0851645>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x665/0x900 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffc084baca>] transaction_kthread+0x18a/0x1c0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffaa09b839>] kthread+0x109/0x140
[<ffffffffaa8459f5>] ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30

The last three lines will stick around for a while.  Is switching to 
space cache v2 something that everyone should be doing?  Something that 
would be a good test at least?


> 2) How big is this filesystem? What does your `btrfs fi df /mountpoint` say?
> 

# btrfs fi df /export/
Data, single: total=30.45TiB, used=30.25TiB
System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=3.62MiB
Metadata, DUP: total=66.50GiB, used=65.08GiB
GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=53.69MiB


> 3) What kind of workload are you running? E.g. how can you describe it
> within a range from "big files which just sit there" to "small writes
> and deletes all over the place all the time"?
> 

It's a pretty light workload most of the time.  It's a file system that 
exports two NFS shares to a small lab group.  I believe it is more small 
reads all over a large file (MRI imaging) rather than small writes.

> 4) What kernel version is this? `uname -a` output?
> 

# uname -a
Linux machine_name 4.12.8-custom #1 SMP Tue Aug 22 10:15:01 EDT 2017 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-01 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-01 14:25 btrfs-transacti hammering the system Matt McKinnon
2017-12-01 14:52 ` Hans van Kranenburg
2017-12-01 15:24   ` Matt McKinnon
2017-12-01 15:39     ` Hans van Kranenburg
2017-12-01 15:42       ` Matt McKinnon
2017-12-01 16:31       ` Matt McKinnon [this message]
2017-12-01 17:06         ` Hans van Kranenburg
2017-12-01 17:13           ` Andrei Borzenkov
2017-12-01 18:04             ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-02 19:42               ` Andrei Borzenkov
2017-12-01 17:34           ` Matt McKinnon
2017-12-01 17:57             ` Holger Hoffstätte
2017-12-01 18:24               ` Hans van Kranenburg
2017-12-01 19:07                 ` Matt McKinnon
2017-12-01 21:03                   ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-01 21:47           ` Duncan
2017-12-01 21:50             ` Matt McKinnon
2017-12-04 12:18               ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-04 14:10                 ` Duncan
2017-12-04 14:30                   ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c9e5ef0a-e60b-b892-272c-1594d47f0657@techsquare.com \
    --to=matt@techsquare.com \
    --cc=hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.