Re: [PATCH 3/3] input: docs: Fix Amiga joysticks grammar & formatting

[Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>]

On 5/26/25 19:48, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 02:14:43AM +0100, George Anthony Vernon wrote:
>>> Make small grammar fixes to Amiga joystick documentation.
>>>
>>> Also make heading adornments compliant with the guidelines to improve
>>> organisation of the page.
>>
>> Split up these two changes into separate patches.
> 
> The word "also" in a changelog is indeed a hint that a patch is doing
> too many things.
> 
> For a simple patch like this, though, I would not force a resend just
> for that.
> 

Do you mean keeping the patch as-is?

>>> -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> -Amiga joystick extensions
>>> -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> +===============
>>> +Amiga joysticks
>>> +===============
>>
>> I would prefer to keep section adornments in this doc as-is, though.
> 
> ...and why...?  We have a standard progression, why not use it?
> 

I'm leaning towards following doc-specific convention (i.e. on this
doc). I could adapt to it, but some time later when I re-read the
source I might be semantically confused.

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara