From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Bcz4R-0003lg-NP for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 21:09:11 -0700 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Bcz4P-0001sD-Tr for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 21:09:10 -0700 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bcz4M-0005ji-00 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 06:09:06 +0200 Received: from pd9e58a6e.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.229.138.110]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 06:09:06 +0200 Received: from skoehler by pd9e58a6e.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 06:09:06 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sven_K=F6hler?= Message-ID: References: <20040621034434.GC2735@thump.bur.st> <20040622135044.GG25291@patrick.wattle.id.au> <200406222035.06782.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> <20040623004832.GD18570@thump.bur.st> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20040623004832.GD18570@thump.bur.st> Subject: [uml-devel] Re: hostfs / current->fsuid Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 06:09:08 +0200 To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Yes, however NFS has a remarkable ability to fuck up locking more often > than not (at least on linux) beside that, i think that the network-protocol could have been designed much simpler and more firewall-friendly. BTW: i am one of those, that think that NFS is faster than hostfs. I cannot explain why, but i would guess, that - at least for parallel file-access - the networking-code required less context-switches, since the network-packets are perhaps queued before giving them to the host-system. That's just a guess, so you may prove me wrong ;-) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel