All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
To: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <cve@kernel.org>, <linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: CVE-2024-50191: ext4: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 15:27:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cbbdac31-c63c-418e-ba00-bb82b96144ee@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024110851-CVE-2024-50191-f31c@gregkh>

> Description
> ===========
>
> In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
>
> ext4: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors
>
> When the filesystem is mounted with errors=remount-ro, we were setting
> SB_RDONLY flag to stop all filesystem modifications. We knew this misses
> proper locking (sb->s_umount) and does not go through proper filesystem
> remount procedure but it has been the way this worked since early ext2
> days and it was good enough for catastrophic situation damage
> mitigation. Recently, syzbot has found a way (see link) to trigger
> warnings in filesystem freezing because the code got confused by
> SB_RDONLY changing under its hands. Since these days we set
> EXT4_FLAGS_SHUTDOWN on the superblock which is enough to stop all
> filesystem modifications, modifying SB_RDONLY shouldn't be needed. So
> stop doing that.
>
> The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-50191 to this issue.
>
>
> Affected and fixed versions
> ===========================
>
>     Fixed in 5.15.168 with commit fbb177bc1d64
>     Fixed in 6.1.113 with commit 4061e07f040a

Since 6.1 and 5.15 don't have backport
     commit 95257987a638 ("ext4: drop EXT4_MF_FS_ABORTED flag"),
we won't set the EXT4_FLAGS_SHUTDOWN bit in ext4_handle_error() yet. So
here these two commits cause us to repeatedly get the following printout:

[   42.993195] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: 
comm fsstress: Detected aborted journal
[   42.993351] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: 
comm fsstress: Detected aborted journal
[   42.993483] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: 
comm fsstress: Detected aborted journal
[   42.993597] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: 
comm fsstress: Detected aborted journal
[   42.993638] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: 
comm fsstress: Detected aborted journal
[   42.993718] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: 
comm fsstress: Detected aborted journal
[   42.993866] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: 
comm fsstress: Detected aborted journal
[   42.993874] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: 
comm fsstress: Detected aborted journal
[   42.993874] EXT4-fs error (device sda) in __ext4_new_inode:1089: 
Journal has aborted
[   42.994059] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: 
comm fsstress: Detected aborted journal
[   42.999893] EXT4-fs: 58002 callbacks suppressed
[   42.999895] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
[   43.000110] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
[   43.000274] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
[   43.000421] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
[   43.000569] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
[   43.000701] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
[   43.000869] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
[   43.001094] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
[   43.001229] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
[   43.001365] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only

Perhaps we should revert both commits.


Thanks,
Baokun

>     Fixed in 6.6.57 with commit 58c0648e4c77
>     Fixed in 6.11.4 with commit ee77c3884691
>     Fixed in 6.12-rc1 with commit d3476f3dad4a
>
> Please see https://www.kernel.org for a full list of currently supported
> kernel versions by the kernel community.
>
> Unaffected versions might change over time as fixes are backported to
> older supported kernel versions.  The official CVE entry at
> https://cve.org/CVERecord/?id=CVE-2024-50191
> will be updated if fixes are backported, please check that for the most
> up to date information about this issue.
>
>
> Affected files
> ==============
>
> The file(s) affected by this issue are:
>     fs/ext4/super.c
>
>
> Mitigation
> ==========
>
> The Linux kernel CVE team recommends that you update to the latest
> stable kernel version for this, and many other bugfixes. Individual
> changes are never tested alone, but rather are part of a larger kernel
> release.  Cherry-picking individual commits is not recommended or
> supported by the Linux kernel community at all.  If however, updating to
> the latest release is impossible, the individual changes to resolve this
> issue can be found at these commits:
> https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fbb177bc1d6487cd3e9b50ae0be2781b7297980d
> https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4061e07f040a091f694f461b86a26cf95ae66439
> https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/58c0648e4c773f5b54f0cb63bc8c7c6bf52719a9
> https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee77c388469116565e009eaa704a60bc78489e09
> https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d3476f3dad4ad68ae5f6b008ea6591d1520da5d8


  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-30  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-08  5:43 CVE-2024-50191: ext4: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-30  7:27 ` Baokun Li [this message]
2024-12-30  7:54   ` Greg KH
2024-12-30  8:21     ` Baokun Li
2024-12-30  8:33       ` Greg KH
2024-12-30  9:06         ` Baokun Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cbbdac31-c63c-418e-ba00-bb82b96144ee@huawei.com \
    --to=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=cve@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.