Re: [PATCH 05/12] btrfs: simplify scrub_recheck_block

[Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>]

On 4.04.22 г. 7:45 ч., Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The I/O in repair_io_failue is synchronous and doesn't need a btrfs_bio,
> so just use an on-stack bio.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> ---
>   fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 18 ++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> index a726962a51984..74c0557e6a2f9 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> @@ -1462,8 +1462,9 @@ static void scrub_recheck_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>   		return scrub_recheck_block_on_raid56(fs_info, sblock);
>   
>   	for (page_num = 0; page_num < sblock->page_count; page_num++) {
> -		struct bio *bio;
>   		struct scrub_page *spage = sblock->pagev[page_num];

This line comes from a patch which is not yet in misc-next as a result 
the patch fails to apply. So which branch are those changes based off?

<snip>