From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:25:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.201]:10817 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S8133549AbWAZPZ3 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:25:29 +0000 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l8so388174nzf for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 07:29:59 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IgZfLke8eXhPKTX5c+oqkdE497K6MwQ5uhqEusRXu7hukn/CU0ldVHcMnsweS84auPrmOV0Y/DCx4yoe2J10yaBA7WiH8wFNZqGaJVdnD4ACtu11GFj0ClcXG4OiDON+htsglITF85UgKmW57lf/vbYGE0T7pob0v4lU5goZ8Tg= Received: by 10.37.13.2 with SMTP id q2mr1550055nzi; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 07:29:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.49.12 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 07:29:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:29:58 +0100 From: Franck To: "Kevin D. Kissell" Subject: Re: [RFC] Optimize swab operations on mips_r2 cpu Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org In-Reply-To: <005101c6228c$6ebfb0a0$10eca8c0@grendel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <43D78725.6050300@mips.com> <20060125141424.GE3454@linux-mips.org> <20060125150404.GF3454@linux-mips.org> <43D7C050.5090607@mips.com> <005101c6228c$6ebfb0a0$10eca8c0@grendel> Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 10178 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: vagabon.xyz@gmail.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips 2006/1/26, Kevin D. Kissell : > Could you please post your mipsel-linux-gcc -v output? It might help. sure, Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/mipsel-linux/3.4.4/specs Configured with: /var/tmp/releasetool-rpm.tmp/bank-20051114-1545/B-i386-linux-rpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/mipssde-6.03.01/configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --disable-gdbtk --enable-languages=c --with-local-prefix=/mipsel-linux/local --disable-multilib --disable-shared --enable-static --disable-threads --target=mipsel-linux --host=i386-linux --build=i386-linux Thread model: single gcc version 3.4.4 mipssde-6.03.01-20051114 > I've never tried building Linux with any of the Sc/Sd/SmartMIPS options, > so I really don't know what you could be experiencing. One thought that > comes to mind is that the -march=4ksd option may be treated as a hint to > generate compact code (for smart cards) in a way that -march=mips32r2 Yes, that's why I tried to pass -mips16e option. > is not. I'll ask around... > Thanks -- Franck