From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>, Feng Yang <yangfeng59949@163.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, posk@google.com,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
eddyz87@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: test_run: Fix the null pointer dereference issue in bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 17:12:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce000648-6f4b-405a-9403-0e4570e7b6bc@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc7b7d2a-9f7e-41ba-9010-dfbf592a0bbd@linux.dev>
On 3/4/26 2:33 AM, Leon Hwang wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
>> index 178c4738e63b..565fe8cbcdc9 100644
>> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
>> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
>> @@ -1156,6 +1156,20 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
>> skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_COMPLETE;
>> }
>>
>> + if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT) {
>> + if (ipv6_bpf_stub) {
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>> + dst_hold(&net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry->dst);
>> + skb_dst_set(skb, &net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry->dst);
>> +#endif
>> + } else {
>> + /* For CONFIG_IPV6=n, ipv6_bpf_stub is NULL */
>> + pr_warn_once("Please test this program with the IPv6 module enabled\n");
>> + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
> NIT: it would be more readable to handle the error path first.
>
> if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT) {
> if (!ipv6_bpf_stub) {
> pr_warn_once("...");
> ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> goto out;
> }
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> dst_hold();
> skb_dst_set();
> #endif
I have adapted this change and applied. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-04 9:44 [PATCH v10 bpf-next 0/2] Fix the null pointer dereference issue in bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap Feng Yang
2026-03-04 9:44 ` [PATCH v10 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: test_run: " Feng Yang
2026-03-04 10:30 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-03-04 10:33 ` Leon Hwang
2026-03-05 1:12 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2026-03-04 9:44 ` [PATCH v10 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for the invocation of bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap Feng Yang
2026-03-04 10:33 ` Leon Hwang
2026-03-05 1:11 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-05 1:34 ` Leon Hwang
2026-03-05 1:10 ` [PATCH v10 bpf-next 0/2] Fix the null pointer dereference issue in bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ce000648-6f4b-405a-9403-0e4570e7b6bc@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=posk@google.com \
--cc=yangfeng59949@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.