From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Lightning round?
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 20:39:55 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf2c4c2b-678a-bda9-bcee-7dd28894e53d@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190425211906.GH4739@mit.edu>
On 4/25/19 3:19 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 02:03:34PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>> which also includes a link to the schedule. Here it is:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Z1pDL-XeUT1ZwMWrBL8T8q3vtSqZpLPgF3Bzu_jejfk
>
> It looks like there are still quite a few open slots on Thursday?
> Could we perhaps schedule a session for lightning talks?
Yes good idea, I've added it. Like previous years, I imagine the
schedule will remain fluid, both as we go into the conference, but also
during. So we can always add and/or move things around.
> I've got at least one thing that I'm hoping to be able to plug as a
> lightning round topic. Folks may remember that a year or two ago I
> had given an LSF/MM talk about changes to the block layer to support
> inline encryption engines[1] (where the data gets encrypted/decrypted
> between the DMA engine and the storage device, typically EMCC/UFS
> flash).
>
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=148190956210784&w=2
>
> Between the Android team really trying to get aligned with upstream,
> and multiple SOC vendors interested in providing inline encryption
> support in hardware, we (finally) have a few engineers who have been
> on implementing this design for the past few months. If all goes
> well, hopefully RFC patches will be published on linux-block,
> linux-fsdevel, and linux-fscrypto by early next week. Assuming this
> happens on schedule, it would be perfect for a lightning talk, with
> the goal of commending this patch series for feedback.
Agree
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-26 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-25 20:00 [LSF/MM] Preliminary agenda ? Anyone ... anyone ? Bueller ? Jerome Glisse
2019-04-25 20:03 ` Jens Axboe
2019-04-25 21:19 ` [LSF/MM TOPIC] Lightning round? Theodore Ts'o
2019-04-26 2:39 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2019-04-26 5:20 ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-27 15:55 ` [LSF/MM] Preliminary agenda ? Anyone ... anyone ? Bueller ? Vlastimil Babka
2019-04-29 10:46 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-04-29 11:31 ` [Lsf] " James Bottomley
2019-04-29 11:36 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-04-29 12:17 ` James Bottomley
2019-04-29 12:31 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-04-30 16:03 ` Jonathan Adams
2019-04-29 23:54 ` Scheduling conflicts Matthew Wilcox
2019-04-30 10:11 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf2c4c2b-678a-bda9-bcee-7dd28894e53d@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.