All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avadhut Naik <avadnaik@amd.com>
To: Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn>,
	kristo@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, tony.luck@intel.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, mchehab@kernel.org, rric@kernel.org
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] EDAC/ti: Fix possible null pointer dereference in _emif_get_id()
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 12:59:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf486746-6f96-4f09-bacb-8019e7f33756@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240724071042.1493917-1-make24@iscas.ac.cn>

On 7/24/24 02:10, Ma Ke wrote:
> In _emif_get_id(), of_get_address() may return NULL which is later
> dereferenced. Fix this bug by adding NULL check.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 86a18ee21e5e ("EDAC, ti: Add support for TI keystone and DRA7xx EDAC")
> Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - added Cc stable line.
> ---
>  drivers/edac/ti_edac.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/ti_edac.c b/drivers/edac/ti_edac.c
> index 29723c9592f7..db23887b2d81 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/ti_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/ti_edac.c
> @@ -207,6 +207,9 @@ static int _emif_get_id(struct device_node *node)
>  	int my_id = 0;
>  
>  	addrp = of_get_address(node, 0, NULL, NULL);
> +	if (!addrp)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	my_addr = (u32)of_translate_address(node, addrp);
>  
>  	for_each_matching_node(np, ti_edac_of_match) {

IIUC, the original v2 submitted seems to differ from this RESEND patch
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-edac/20240718134834.826890-1-make24@iscas.ac.cn/

Snippet from submitting-patches:
Don’t add “RESEND” when you are submitting a modified version of your patch or patch series - “RESEND” only applies to resubmission of a patch or patch series which have not been modified in any way from the previous submission.

Any specific reason for this change?

From a brief look, it seems that the original v2 was correct.
Check for NULL pointer deference might be required in both places
in _emif_get_id().

Also, some more context on how this was noticed might help.
Was it through mere observation?

Thanks,
Avadhut Naik

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-24 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-24  7:10 [PATCH v2 RESEND] EDAC/ti: Fix possible null pointer dereference in _emif_get_id() Ma Ke
2024-07-24 13:31 ` Greg KH
2024-07-24 17:59 ` Avadhut Naik [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cf486746-6f96-4f09-bacb-8019e7f33756@amd.com \
    --to=avadnaik@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kristo@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=make24@iscas.ac.cn \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=rric@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.