Re: [External] : [PATCH] ocfs2: remove unnecessary NULL check in ocfs2_grab_folios()

[Mark Tinguely <mark.tinguely@oracle.com>]

On 8/19/25 4:41 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Smatch complains that checking "folios" for NULL doesn't make sense
> because it has already been dereferenced at this point.  Really passing a
> NULL "folios" pointer to ocfs2_grab_folios() doesn't make sense, and
> fortunately none of the callers do that.  Delete the unnecessary NULL
> check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> ---
>   fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> index 821cb7874685..162711cc5b20 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> @@ -6928,8 +6928,7 @@ static int ocfs2_grab_folios(struct inode *inode, loff_t start, loff_t end,
>   
>   out:
>   	if (ret != 0) {
> -		if (folios)
> -			ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios);
> +		ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios);
>   		numfolios = 0;
>   	}
>   

Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <mark.tinguely@oracle.com>