From: Karolina Stolarek <karolina.stolarek@intel.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Improve test coverage of TTM
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 09:20:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf7472e8-d2b9-41cd-90cc-b7a467bf08a0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1701257386.git.karolina.stolarek@intel.com>
Hi Christian,
On 29.11.2023 13:02, Karolina Stolarek wrote:
> Karolina Stolarek (8):
> drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_resource and ttm_sys_man
> drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_tt
> drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_bo functions
> drm/ttm/tests: Fix argument in ttm_tt_kunit_init()
Would it be possible to get these patches merged? They already have
r-b's. There are a couple more, but these don't depend on any other
patch that is pending review, and should be easy to get in.
I'm asking for this because I have three final patches ready for
submission (eviction, ttm_tt_populate, TODO file) and wondered if I
should submit them as v9, or if I could create a new series. I'd prefer
creating a new one, this patchset is already big and intimidating :)
Having said that, thank you for taking your time to review the tests, I
really appreciate it.
All the best,
Karolina
> drm/ttm/tests: Use an init function from the helpers lib
> drm/ttm/tests: Test simple BO creation and validation
> drm/ttm/tests: Add tests with mock resource managers
> drm/ttm/tests: Add test cases dependent on fence signaling
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/.kunitconfig | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/Makefile | 5 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_test.c | 622 ++++++++++++++
> .../gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c | 795 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_kunit_helpers.c | 109 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_kunit_helpers.h | 7 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_mock_manager.c | 207 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_mock_manager.h | 31 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_pool_test.c | 3 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_resource_test.c | 335 ++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_tt_test.c | 282 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c | 3 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.c | 3 +
> 14 files changed, 2401 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_test.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_mock_manager.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_mock_manager.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_resource_test.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_tt_test.c
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-14 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-29 12:02 [PATCH v8 0/8] Improve test coverage of TTM Karolina Stolarek
2023-11-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_resource and ttm_sys_man Karolina Stolarek
2023-11-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_tt Karolina Stolarek
2023-11-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_bo functions Karolina Stolarek
2023-11-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] drm/ttm/tests: Fix argument in ttm_tt_kunit_init() Karolina Stolarek
2023-11-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] drm/ttm/tests: Use an init function from the helpers lib Karolina Stolarek
2023-11-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] drm/ttm/tests: Test simple BO creation and validation Karolina Stolarek
2023-11-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests with mock resource managers Karolina Stolarek
2023-11-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] drm/ttm/tests: Add test cases dependent on fence signaling Karolina Stolarek
2023-12-05 15:29 ` Andi Shyti
2023-12-06 11:49 ` Karolina Stolarek
2023-12-05 15:39 ` [PATCH v8 0/8] Improve test coverage of TTM Andi Shyti
2023-12-06 11:28 ` Karolina Stolarek
2023-12-06 11:46 ` Andi Shyti
2023-12-14 8:20 ` Karolina Stolarek [this message]
2023-12-14 10:22 ` Christian König
2023-12-14 14:13 ` Karolina Stolarek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf7472e8-d2b9-41cd-90cc-b7a467bf08a0@intel.com \
--to=karolina.stolarek@intel.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.