From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/5] scsi: hpsa: fix selection of reply queue To: "Bityutskiy, Artem" , "martin.petersen@oracle.com" , "James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com" , "ming.lei@redhat.com" Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "snitzer@redhat.com" , "hch@lst.de" , "hare@suse.de" , "mroos@linux.ee" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "don.brace@microsemi.com" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "loberman@redhat.com" , "kashyap.desai@broadcom.com" References: <20180313094243.8710-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20180313094243.8710-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> <1521460114.4592.29.camel@intel.com> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:31:48 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1521460114.4592.29.camel@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-ID: On 3/19/18 5:48 AM, Bityutskiy, Artem wrote: > On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 17:42 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: >> From 84676c1f21 (genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs), >> one msix vector can be created without any online CPU mapped, then one >> command's completion may not be notified. > > Hello Martin, James, > > we have this patch-set and it fixes megaraid regression in v4.16. Do > you plan to mege it to v4.16-rcX? I am worried - there seem to be no > sight that this is going to me merged. They are not in the linux-next. I'm assuming that Martin will eventually queue this up. But probably for 4.17, then we can always flag it for a backport to stable once it's been thoroughly tested. -- Jens Axboe