From: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
To: Mehmet Fide <mehmet.fide@gmail.com>,
Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-next] wifi: rtw88: usb: do not log transfers lost to a mode switch
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 20:01:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf94fcd9-b119-4116-a7c5-4866fd2e63e5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812122858.3317577-1-mehmet.fide@gmail.com>
On 12/08/2026 15:28, Mehmet Fide wrote:
> An RTL8822BU or RTL8822CU is asked to come back as a USB 3 device by
> rtw_usb_switch_mode_new(), added in commit 315c23a64e99 ("wifi: rtw88:
> usb: Support USB 3 with RTL8822CU/RTL8822BU"). The chip powers off its
> MAC and leaves the bus while the last control transfers of that sequence
> are still in flight, so they complete with -EPROTO and the driver reports
> them as errors:
>
> rtw_8822bu 1-1:1.0: Firmware version 27.2.0, H2C version 13
> rtw_8822bu 1-1:1.0: write register 0xc4 failed with -71
> usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 2
> usbcore: registered new interface driver rtw_8822bu
> rtw_8822bu 1-1:1.0: Firmware version 27.2.0, H2C version 13
>
> Register 0xc4 is REG_PAD_CTRL2 and the access losing the race is the
> rtw_write32_set() that ends the switch sequence, a few milliseconds before
> the disconnect. Which transfer gets caught varies from boot to boot: 0xc4
> is in the "always on" section, so every write to it is followed by a second
> one from rtw_usb_reg_sec(), and sometimes that is the one that fails:
>
> rtw_8822bu 1-1:1.0: rtw_usb_reg_sec: reg 0x4e0, usb write 1 fail, status: -71
>
> Nothing is wrong here. The device re-enumerates, probes again and registers
> normally, which is why rtw_usb_probe() already treats a non-zero return
> from rtw_usb_switch_mode() as "Not a fail". On a USB 2 only port the
> switch can never succeed, so the message returns on every boot and
> everyone using such a port has to work out that it is harmless.
>
> Mark the window in which the chip is expected to leave the bus and skip the
> error reports for transfers that fall into it. The flag is never cleared
> because the switch always ends in a re-probe with a fresh struct rtw_usb.
>
> Tested with an RTL8822BU (0x7392:0xb822) on a USB 2 root port of a TI AM62,
> where the message appears exactly once per boot. With the patch both lines
> are gone while the disconnect, the re-enumeration and the second firmware
> load are unchanged. The tested build was 6.12.103 carrying the same change;
> the hunks differ only in context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mehmet Fide <mehmet.fide@gmail.com>
I guess this is one way to do it.
I was going to do this the same way I did for rtw89, along with some
other changes, like retry control messages up to 10 times and do both
reads and writes from a single function. But I got busy with life stuff
and haven't started.
By the way, RTL8812AU and RTL8814AU (handled by rtw_usb_switch_mode_old())
have the same problem.
Your patch looks funny. Please generate patches using "git format-patch",
and use the rtw-next branch from https://github.com/pkshih/rtw.
> ---
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/usb.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
> RTW_USB_CMD_REQ, RTW_USB_CMD_WRITE,
> t_reg, 0, data, t_len, 500);
>
> - if (status != t_len && status != -ENODEV)
> + if (status != t_len && status != -ENODEV && !rtwusb->switching_mode)
> rtw_err(rtwdev, "%s: reg 0x%x, usb write %u fail, status: %d\n",
> __func__, t_reg, t_len, status);
> }
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
> ret = usb_control_msg(udev, usb_rcvctrlpipe(udev, 0),
> RTW_USB_CMD_REQ, RTW_USB_CMD_READ, addr,
> RTW_USB_VENQT_CMD_IDX, data, len, 1000);
> - if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENODEV && count++ < 4)
> + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENODEV && !rtwusb->switching_mode && count++ < 4)
> rtw_err(rtwdev, "read register 0x%x failed with %d\n",
> addr, ret);
>
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@
> ret = usb_control_msg(udev, usb_sndctrlpipe(udev, 0),
> RTW_USB_CMD_REQ, RTW_USB_CMD_WRITE,
> addr, 0, data, len, 500);
> - if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENODEV && count++ < 4)
> + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENODEV && !rtwusb->switching_mode && count++ < 4)
> rtw_err(rtwdev, "write register 0x%x failed with %d\n",
> addr, ret);
>
> @@ -1111,6 +1111,7 @@
>
> static int rtw_usb_switch_mode_new(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev)
> {
> + struct rtw_usb *rtwusb = rtw_get_usb_priv(rtwdev);
> enum usb_device_speed cur_speed;
> u8 id = rtwdev->chip->id;
> bool can_switch;
> @@ -1151,6 +1152,11 @@
> rtw_write32(rtwdev, REG_PAD_CTRL2, pad_ctrl2);
> rtw_write8(rtwdev, REG_PAD_CTRL2 + 1, 4);
>
> + /* From here the chip powers off its MAC and re-enumerates, so it can
> + * leave the bus while a control transfer is still in flight.
> + */
> + rtwusb->switching_mode = true;
> +
> rtw_write16_set(rtwdev, REG_SYS_PW_CTRL, BIT_APFM_OFFMAC);
> usleep_range(1000, 1001);
> rtw_write32_set(rtwdev, REG_PAD_CTRL2, BIT_NO_PDN_CHIPOFF_V1);
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/usb.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/usb.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,9 @@
> struct sk_buff_head rx_free_queue;
> struct work_struct rx_work;
> struct work_struct rx_urb_work;
> +
> + /* the chip is re-enumerating, control transfers are expected to fail */
> + bool switching_mode;
> };
>
> static inline struct rtw_usb_tx_data *rtw_usb_get_tx_data(struct sk_buff *skb)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 12:28 [PATCH wireless-next] wifi: rtw88: usb: do not log transfers lost to a mode switch Mehmet Fide
2026-08-12 17:01 ` Bitterblue Smith [this message]
2026-08-12 17:32 ` [PATCH rtw-next v2] " Mehmet Fide
2026-08-13 0:41 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-08-13 6:40 ` [PATCH rtw-next v3] " Mehmet Fide
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf94fcd9-b119-4116-a7c5-4866fd2e63e5@gmail.com \
--to=rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mehmet.fide@gmail.com \
--cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.