All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bizarre 2.6.8.1 /sys permissions
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:00:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cglbia$9o2$1@gatekeeper.tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040826004857.GA5583@redhat.com>

Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 04:31:50PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
>  > >  > $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_cur_freq
>  > >  > cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_cur_freq: Permission denied
>  > > Reading this file causes reads from hardware on some cpufreq drivers.
>  > > This can be a slow operation, so a user could degrade system performance
>  > > for everyone else by repeatedly cat'ing it.
>  > 
>  > any reason why cpuinfo_cur_freq cant read cpu_khz ?
> 
> cpufreq_cur_freq will be one of scaling_available_frequencies.
> These are usually a value such as 1300MHz, where cpu_mhz is a
> 'measured' value and will look something like 1303.852
> 
> the values cpufreq uses are the values either returned by the
> hardware as its settable states, or from BIOS tables defining
> those states.
> 
>  > or rather, is there any reason why cpuinfo_cur_freq and /proc/cpuinfo 
>  > should legitimately differ?
> 
> They aren't identical, and serve different purposes.

Okay, so cpufreq just gives informational values in a table while 
/proc/cpuinfo actually reflects the speed of the CPU. Right? That's 
good, I thought there was an problem if they were different.

-- 
    -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
  last possible moment - but no longer"  -me

      reply	other threads:[~2004-08-26 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-25 20:25 bizarre 2.6.8.1 /sys permissions Dan Hollis
2004-08-25 22:18 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-25 23:31   ` Dan Hollis
2004-08-26  0:48     ` Dave Jones
2004-08-26 19:00       ` Bill Davidsen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='cglbia$9o2$1@gatekeeper.tmr.com' \
    --to=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.