All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: adimaths@softhome.net
To: Mauelshagen@sistina.com
Cc: linux-lvm@sistina.com, adimaths@softhome.net
Subject: [linux-lvm] RE:problem of lvm on suse
Date: Mon Oct 27 04:35:02 2003	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <courier.3F9CF496.00006524@softhome.net> (raw)

Hi, 

I have tried both the sorting order of our devices,
in /proc/paritions.
It still does not work. 

When I did pvscan with debug option , it gave the
following: This is with our devices on top of /proc/partitions. 

<1> pv_read_all_pv -- calling stat with "/dev/pseudo_device1"
<22> pv_read -- CALLED with /dev/pseudo_device1
<333> pv_check_name -- CALLED with "/dev/pseudo_device1"
<4444> lvm_check_chars -- CALLED with name: "/dev/pseudo_device1"
<4444> lvm_check_chars -- LEAVING with ret: 0
<333> pv_check_name -- LEAVING with ret: 0
<22> pv_read -- going to read /dev/pseudo_device1
<333> lvm_check_dev -- CALLED
<4444> lvm_check_partitioned_dev -- CALLED
<55555> lvm_get_device_type called
<55555> lvm_get_device_type leaving with 1
<4444> lvm_check_partitioned_dev -- LEAVING with ret: TRUE
<333> lvm_check_dev -- LEAVING with ret: 1
<333> pv_copy_from_disk -- CALLED 

<333> pv_copy_from_disk -- LEAVING ret = 0x8054508 

<333> pv_create_name_from_kdev_t -- CALLED with 253:129 

<4444> lvm_check_dev -- CALLED
<55555> lvm_check_partitioned_dev -- CALLED
<666666> lvm_get_device_type called
<666666> lvm_get_device_type leaving with 1
<55555> lvm_check_partitioned_dev -- LEAVING with ret: TRUE
<4444> lvm_check_dev -- LEAVING with ret: 1
<4444> lvm_dir_cache -- CALLED
<4444> lvm_dir_cache -- LEAVING with ret: 147
<333> pv_create_name_from_kdev_t -- LEAVING with dev_name: 
/dev/pseudo_device1
<333> system_id_check_exported -- CALLED
<333> system_id_check_exported -- LEAVING with ret: 0
<22> pv_read -- LEAVING with ret: 0
<22> pv_get_size -- CALLED with /dev/pseudo_device1 and 0xbffff570
<333> lvm_dir_cache -- CALLED
<333> lvm_dir_cache -- LEAVING with ret: 147
<333> lvm_dir_cache_find -- CALLED with /dev/pseudo_device1
<4444> pv_check_name -- CALLED with "/dev/pseudo_device1"
<55555> lvm_check_chars -- CALLED with name: "/dev/pseudo_device1"
<55555> lvm_check_chars -- LEAVING with ret: 0
<4444> pv_check_name -- LEAVING with ret: 0
<4444> lvm_dir_cache -- CALLED
<4444> lvm_dir_cache -- LEAVING with ret: 147 

<333> lvm_dir_cache_find -- LEAVING with entry: 21 

<333> lvm_check_partitioned_dev -- CALLED
<4444> lvm_get_device_type called
<4444> lvm_get_device_type leaving with 1
<333> lvm_check_partitioned_dev -- LEAVING with ret: TRUE 

<333> lvm_partition_count -- CALLED for 0xfd81 

<4444> lvm_get_device_type called
<4444> lvm_get_device_type leaving with 1
<333> lvm_partition_count -- LEAVING with ret: 16
<22> pv_get_size -- BEFORE llseek 0:0
<22> pv_get_size -- part[0].sys_ind: 8E  part[0].nr_sects: 79950
<22> pv_get_size -- first == 1
<22> pv_get_size -- part_i == part_i_tmp
<22> pv_get_size -- LEAVING with ret: 79950 

<22> pv_check_and_add_paths -- CALLED with pv_list=(nil) and 
pv_new=0x8054508 

<22> pv_check_and_add_paths -- LEAVING with rc=0
<22> pv_check_volume -- CALLED  dev_name: "/dev/pseudo_device1"  pv: 8054508
<333> pv_check_name -- CALLED with "/dev/pseudo_device1"
<4444> lvm_check_chars -- CALLED with name: "/dev/pseudo_device1"
<4444> lvm_check_chars -- LEAVING with ret: 0
<333> pv_check_name -- LEAVING with ret: 0
<333> pv_check_new -- CALLED
<333> pv_check_new -- LEAVING with ret: 0
<333> vg_check_name -- CALLED with VG: vg
<4444> lvm_check_chars -- CALLED with name: "vg"
<4444> lvm_check_chars -- LEAVING with ret: 0
<333> vg_check_name -- LEAVING with ret: 0
<22> pv_check_volume -- LEAVING with ret: 1
<1> pv_read_all_pv: allocating for /dev/pseudo_device1 vg 

 


now when the 1st scsi device corresponding the above pseudo device
(ie its path) was scanned the foll was the output: 

<1> pv_read_all_pv -- calling stat with "/dev/sds1"
<22> pv_read -- CALLED with /dev/sds1
<333> pv_check_name -- CALLED with "/dev/sds1"
<4444> lvm_check_chars -- CALLED with name: "/dev/sds1"
<4444> lvm_check_chars -- LEAVING with ret: 0
<333> pv_check_name -- LEAVING with ret: 0
<22> pv_read -- going to read /dev/sds1
<333> lvm_check_dev -- CALLED
<4444> lvm_check_partitioned_dev -- CALLED
<55555> lvm_get_device_type called
<55555> lvm_get_device_type leaving with 1
<4444> lvm_check_partitioned_dev -- LEAVING with ret: TRUE
<333> lvm_check_dev -- LEAVING with ret: 1
<333> pv_copy_from_disk -- CALLED 

<333> pv_copy_from_disk -- LEAVING ret = 0x805bda0 

<333> pv_create_name_from_kdev_t -- CALLED with 65:33 

<4444> lvm_check_dev -- CALLED
<55555> lvm_check_partitioned_dev -- CALLED
<666666> lvm_get_device_type called
<666666> lvm_get_device_type leaving with 1
<55555> lvm_check_partitioned_dev -- LEAVING with ret: TRUE
<4444> lvm_check_dev -- LEAVING with ret: 1
<4444> lvm_dir_cache -- CALLED
<4444> lvm_dir_cache -- LEAVING with ret: 147
<333> pv_create_name_from_kdev_t -- LEAVING with dev_name: /dev/sds1
<333> system_id_check_exported -- CALLED
<333> system_id_check_exported -- LEAVING with ret: 0
<22> pv_read -- LEAVING with ret: 0
<22> pv_get_size -- CALLED with /dev/sds1 and 0xbffff570
<333> lvm_dir_cache -- CALLED
<333> lvm_dir_cache -- LEAVING with ret: 147
<333> lvm_dir_cache_find -- CALLED with /dev/sds1
<4444> pv_check_name -- CALLED with "/dev/sds1"
<55555> lvm_check_chars -- CALLED with name: "/dev/sds1"
<55555> lvm_check_chars -- LEAVING with ret: 0
<4444> pv_check_name -- LEAVING with ret: 0
<4444> lvm_dir_cache -- CALLED
<4444> lvm_dir_cache -- LEAVING with ret: 147 

<333> lvm_dir_cache_find -- LEAVING with entry: 59 

<333> lvm_check_partitioned_dev -- CALLED
<4444> lvm_get_device_type called
<4444> lvm_get_device_type leaving with 1
<333> lvm_check_partitioned_dev -- LEAVING with ret: TRUE 

<333> lvm_partition_count -- CALLED for 0x4121 

<4444> lvm_get_device_type called
<4444> lvm_get_device_type leaving with 1
<333> lvm_partition_count -- LEAVING with ret: 16
<22> pv_get_size -- BEFORE llseek 0:0
<22> pv_get_size -- part[0].sys_ind: 8E  part[0].nr_sects: 79950
<22> pv_get_size -- first == 1
<22> pv_get_size -- part_i == part_i_tmp
<22> pv_get_size -- LEAVING with ret: 79950 

<22> pv_check_and_add_paths -- CALLED with pv_list=0x8054a60 and 
pv_new=0x805bda
0 

<22> pv_check_and_add_paths -- identical UUIDs for device 253:129 and 65:33
<22> pv_check_and_add_paths -- initializing default path
<22> pv_check_and_add_paths -- adding path at position 0
<22> pv_check_and_add_paths -- path count is 2
<22> pv_check_and_add_paths -- LEAVING with rc=1 


Regards
Aditya 

 

 

 

 


 ----- Original Message -----
From: "Heinz J . Mauelshagen" <mauelshagen@sistina.com>
To: <adimaths@softhome.net>
Cc: <mailto:Mauelshagen@sistina.com;; <linux-lvm@sistina.com>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 4:01 PM
Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: Problem of LVM on Suse 


> On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 06:50:29PM -0600, adimaths@softhome.net wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am facing a problem in using LVM bundled with Suse Enterprise server 8
> > ,connected to storage area newtork
> > System configuration:
> > A storage area network is connected to a server with OS Suse Enterprise
> > server 8.
> > So there are multiple scsi devices whose physical disk is identical.
> >
> > We are creating a Pseudo device file asscociated with identical scsi
devices
> > using a driver that we have created.
> > eg : /dev/pseudo-device -> /dev/sda , /dev/sdb
> >
> > Now using the bundled LVM on such pseudo device is a problem.
> > problem details:
> > pvcreate /dev/pseudo-device
> > [result] ok.
> >
> > pvscan
> > [result] it shows the scsi device associated with this pseudo device ie
> > /dev/sda and not our pseudo device.
> >
> > If LVM bypasses our pseudo device then the purpose of creating this
device
> > and associating it with scsi is futile.
> >
> > The irony is, LVM works fine on RH 2.1 kernel = 2.4.9-e.3 and also with
RH
> > 7.2
> > However the above mention problem is observed on Suse Enterprise server
8
> > ,RH 2.1 kernel =2.4.9-e.25, RH 7.3 and RH 8.0.
> >
> > Would request you to clarify the following :
> > 1>Could you please tell me how this problem can be rectified ? 
>
> Change the sort-order (as you suggested below) 
>
> >
> > 2>Is it that Lvm that is bundled with the OS can't be used for
> > the above mentioned purpose ?
> >
> > 3>If it can't be , then what design feature
> > of the current LVM prevents it from supporting the above task?
> >
> > 4> Can any change in our product help us to solve this problem?
> >
> > 5>Moreover I think LVM on RedHat is working just by chance.
> > I think pvscan depends on the order of the devices in the
> > /proc/partitions , and hence when our pseudo devices are
> > at the end of the /proc/paritions , pvscan shows our devices
> > as active else it shows scsi as active.
> >
> > Is my inference correct? 
>
> Yes. 
>
> LVM2 is much more suitable to cover such vendor-specific configurations,
> because it has configurable device name filters. LVM1 needs code changes
> to support additional device name spaces. 
>
> >
> > Regards
> > Aditya Vasudevan 
>
> -- 
>
> Regards,
> Heinz    -- The LVM Guy -- 
>
> *** Software bugs are stupid.
>     Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them *** 
>
>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-
>
> Heinz Mauelshagen                                 Sistina Software Inc.
> Senior Consultant/Developer                       Am Sonnenhang 11
>                                                   56242 Marienrachdorf
>                                                   Germany
> Mauelshagen@Sistina.com                           +49 2626 141200
>                                                        FAX 924446 
>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

             reply	other threads:[~2003-10-27  4:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-27  4:35 adimaths [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-24  6:34 [linux-lvm] Problem of LVM on Suse adimaths
2003-10-24  6:34 ` [linux-lvm] " Heinz J . Mauelshagen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=courier.3F9CF496.00006524@softhome.net \
    --to=adimaths@softhome.net \
    --cc=Mauelshagen@sistina.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.