All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 7091@blargh.com
To: 7091@blargh.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com
Subject: Re: sata_sil, writing bug with multiple cards?
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 20:22:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <courier.468B1258.000018F4@blargh.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <courier.468B005A.0000127A@blargh.com>

7091@blargh.com writes: 

> Tejun Heo writes:  
> 
>> Sounds awfully similar to the recent nvidia data corruption issue.  It
>> was involving the IOMMU and one of the workarounds was not using IOMMU,
>> IIRC.  Please turn off IOMMU and see what happens.  You can turn IOMMU
>> off by passing "iommu=off" as kernel parameter.  
>> 
>> -- 
>> tejun
> 
> Blast.  I stand corrected - it didn't fix it.  
> 
> I now have 3 300G drives hanging off the add-in card, sda sdb sdc.  I did 
> the following:  
> 
> # Make a RAID5 array of 3 out of the 4 drives I'll eventually be using
> mdadm --create /dev/md6 --chunk=64 --level=raid5 --raid-devices=4 
> /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 missing

Here's an odd data point. 

I just broke that array, formatted all three of those partitions seperately, 
mounted and did my ISO copy test. 

All three drives, run one at a time, function fine.  No corruption.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-04  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-03  6:42 sata_sil, writing bug with multiple cards? 7091
2007-07-03  8:51 ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-04  1:40   ` 7091
2007-07-04  1:48     ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-04  2:05   ` 7091
2007-07-04  3:22     ` 7091 [this message]
2007-07-04  3:44       ` 7091
2007-07-04  3:53         ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-04  7:08           ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-04  8:17             ` 7091
2007-07-04  8:38               ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-04  8:52                 ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-10 10:55                   ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-12  3:21                     ` 7091
2007-07-04  3:41     ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-04  9:18     ` Alan Cox
2007-07-04  9:14       ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-04  9:26       ` 7091
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-27 21:36 7091
2007-07-08  8:01 ` Janos Haar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=courier.468B1258.000018F4@blargh.com \
    --to=7091@blargh.com \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.