From: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Jef Driesen <jefdriesen@hotmail.com>,
Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>, <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] Pretty formats for reflog data
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:48:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1255966426.git.trast@student.ethz.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vaazonwtr.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> One solution to help the compiler catch this kind of semantic crash upon
> merging or applying code based on the old format_commit_message() would
> have been to change its function signature (or even the name), so that it
> would not go unnoticed that DATE_NORMAL that happens to be "0" is silently
> interpreted as (void *)0 == NULL.
Indeed, that would have been a good idea. (I still don't fully see
the use of allowing an enum value as a pointer, but apparently the
standard's that way.)
I fixed the calls to format_commit_message(), but without changing the
function signature compared to the last patch. I also decided not to
put in the test case; the easiest I could come up with was the
following:
-- 8< --
diff --git i/t/t5001-archive-attr.sh w/t/t5001-archive-attr.sh
index 426b319..0950527 100755
--- i/t/t5001-archive-attr.sh
+++ w/t/t5001-archive-attr.sh
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ test_description='git archive attribute tests'
. ./test-lib.sh
-SUBSTFORMAT=%H%n
+SUBSTFORMAT=%H%ad%n
test_expect_exists() {
test_expect_success " $1 exists" "test -e $1"
-- >8 --
which immediately fails most tests in the file because of segfaults
with the buggy series. However, it still wouldn't catch other broken
callers, if there were any, so I left it out.
Compared to v3, I also rebased the series on current master, which
conflicted with 7f98ebc (format_commit_message(): fix function
signature, 2009-10-15) so you now need that commit to apply it.
Finally, I squashed a revert of 0a0c342 (git-stash documentation:
mention default options for 'list', 2009-10-12) into 5/5 since there
are no more default options after my patch.
Thomas Rast (5):
Refactor pretty_print_commit arguments into a struct
reflog-walk: refactor the branch@{num} formatting
Introduce new pretty formats %g[sdD] for reflog information
stash list: use new %g formats instead of sed
stash list: drop the default limit of 10 stashes
Documentation/git-stash.txt | 3 +-
Documentation/pretty-formats.txt | 9 ++++
archive.c | 4 +-
builtin-branch.c | 3 +-
builtin-checkout.c | 3 +-
builtin-commit.c | 8 +++-
builtin-log.c | 3 +-
builtin-merge.c | 7 ++-
builtin-rev-list.c | 7 ++-
builtin-shortlog.c | 9 +++-
builtin-show-branch.c | 4 +-
commit.h | 20 ++++++---
git-stash.sh | 8 +---
log-tree.c | 25 ++++++-----
pretty.c | 44 ++++++++++++++------
reflog-walk.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
reflog-walk.h | 8 ++++
t/t6006-rev-list-format.sh | 18 ++++++++
18 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-19 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-12 15:47 git stash list with more than 10 items? Jef Driesen
2009-10-12 17:52 ` Jeff King
2009-10-12 19:37 ` [PATCH] git-stash documentation: mention default options for 'list' Miklos Vajna
2009-10-12 19:39 ` Jeff King
2009-10-12 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] Pretty formats for reflog data Thomas Rast
2009-10-12 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] reflog-walk: refactor the branch@{num} formatting Thomas Rast
2009-10-12 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] Introduce new pretty formats %g and %G for reflog information Thomas Rast
2009-10-14 4:59 ` Jeff King
2009-10-14 9:58 ` Thomas Rast
2009-10-14 9:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-12 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] stash: Use new %g/%G formats instead of sed Thomas Rast
2009-10-14 5:00 ` Jeff King
2009-10-12 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] stash list: drop the default limit of 10 stashes Thomas Rast
2009-10-14 5:02 ` Jeff King
2009-10-12 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] stash: change built-in ref to 'stash' instead of 'refs/stash' Thomas Rast
2009-10-14 5:06 ` Jeff King
2009-10-15 22:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Pretty formats for reflog data Thomas Rast
2009-10-15 22:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] Refactor pretty_print_commit arguments into a struct Thomas Rast
2009-10-15 22:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] reflog-walk: refactor the branch@{num} formatting Thomas Rast
2009-10-15 22:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] Introduce new pretty formats %g[sdD] for reflog information Thomas Rast
2009-10-16 5:32 ` Jeff King
2009-10-16 8:50 ` Thomas Rast
2009-10-16 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Pretty formats for reflog data Thomas Rast
2009-10-16 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] Refactor pretty_print_commit arguments into a struct Thomas Rast
2009-10-17 17:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-18 18:51 ` Thomas Rast
2009-10-18 22:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-19 15:48 ` Thomas Rast [this message]
2009-10-19 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 " Thomas Rast
2009-10-19 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] reflog-walk: refactor the branch@{num} formatting Thomas Rast
2009-10-19 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] Introduce new pretty formats %g[sdD] for reflog information Thomas Rast
2009-10-19 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] stash list: use new %g formats instead of sed Thomas Rast
2009-10-19 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] stash list: drop the default limit of 10 stashes Thomas Rast
2009-10-16 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] reflog-walk: refactor the branch@{num} formatting Thomas Rast
2009-10-16 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] Introduce new pretty formats %g[sdD] for reflog information Thomas Rast
2009-10-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v3.1 " Thomas Rast
2009-10-17 15:06 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-10-18 7:18 ` Jeff King
2009-10-18 10:34 ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-10-16 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] stash list: use new %g formats instead of sed Thomas Rast
2009-10-16 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] stash list: drop the default limit of 10 stashes Thomas Rast
2009-10-17 0:50 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Pretty formats for reflog data Junio C Hamano
2009-10-17 1:18 ` Jeff King
2009-10-15 22:41 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] stash list: use new %g formats instead of sed Thomas Rast
2009-10-15 22:41 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] stash list: drop the default limit of 10 stashes Thomas Rast
2009-10-16 5:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Pretty formats for reflog data Jeff King
2009-10-16 9:00 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-10-12 21:37 ` [RFC PATCH " Jeff King
2009-10-12 21:52 ` Thomas Rast
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1255966426.git.trast@student.ethz.ch \
--to=trast@student.ethz.ch \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jefdriesen@hotmail.com \
--cc=nanako3@lavabit.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.