From: Dongxiao Xu <dongxiao.xu@intel.com>
To: poky@yoctoproject.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] Machine specific sysroot implementation
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:18:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1294726280.git.dongxiao.xu@intel.com> (raw)
Hi Richard,
This RFC is the third version of machine specific sysroot implementation.
Please help to review.
Testings could pass for qemuppc and mpc8315d-rdb.
However if modify emenlow architecture to be "core2" and test builds for atom-pc and emenlow, it failed due to an libtool sysroot issue, which is stated in another email. But I think we can have a review of the patchset first.
After the libtool sysroot support is enabled, I will test again for atom-pc and emenlow.
Changes from v2:
1) Use the v1 approach to add ${MACHINE} into stamp file, and rebase the patch against latest bitbake which did a merge with upstream. This also can avoid adding unnecessary ${MACHINE} information for native/nativesdk/crosssdk/cross-canadian task stamps.
RFC URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git
Branch: dxu4/mach_sysroot_v3
Browse: http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=dxu4/mach_sysroot_v3
Thanks,
Dongxiao Xu <dongxiao.xu@intel.com>
---
Dongxiao Xu (3):
staging: Use relative path in sysroot-destdir for target recipes
bitbake: Introduce stamp-extra-info into build stamp file
bitbake: machine specific sysroots implementation
bitbake/lib/bb/build.py | 10 ++-----
bitbake/lib/bb/cache.py | 19 ++++++++++++-
bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py | 12 ++++----
bitbake/lib/bb/siggen.py | 20 ++++++++++++-
meta/classes/binconfig.bbclass | 6 ++--
meta/classes/cross-canadian.bbclass | 5 +++-
meta/classes/cross.bbclass | 5 +++
meta/classes/crosssdk.bbclass | 2 +
meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 2 +-
meta/classes/native.bbclass | 4 +++
meta/classes/nativesdk.bbclass | 7 ++++-
meta/classes/package.bbclass | 1 +
meta/classes/siteconfig.bbclass | 11 ++++---
meta/classes/sstate.bbclass | 6 +++-
meta/classes/staging.bbclass | 28 ++++++++++---------
meta/classes/toolchain-scripts.bbclass | 4 +-
meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 11 ++++---
meta/recipes-connectivity/gupnp/gupnp_0.14.0.bb | 4 +-
.../gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate.inc | 3 ++
meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool-cross_2.4.bb | 4 +-
.../libtool/libtool-nativesdk_2.4.bb | 4 +-
meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool_2.4.bb | 6 ++--
meta/recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+.inc | 4 +-
meta/recipes-support/apr/apr_1.3.3.bb | 2 +-
24 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2011-01-11 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-11 6:18 Dongxiao Xu [this message]
2011-01-11 6:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] staging: Use relative path in sysroot-destdir for target recipes Dongxiao Xu
2011-01-11 6:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] bitbake: Introduce stamp-extra-info into build stamp file Dongxiao Xu
2011-01-11 12:11 ` Joshua Lock
2011-01-12 11:48 ` Richard Purdie
2011-01-11 6:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] bitbake: machine specific sysroots implementation Dongxiao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1294726280.git.dongxiao.xu@intel.com \
--to=dongxiao.xu@intel.com \
--cc=poky@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.