From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] Clean up ticketlock implementation
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:41:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1295909908.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> (raw)
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Hi all,
This series cleans up the x86 ticketlock implementation by converting
a large proportion of it to C. This eliminates the need for having
separate implementations for "large" (NR_CPUS >= 256) and "small"
(NR_CPUS < 256) ticket locks.
This also lays the groundwork for future changes to the ticketlock
implementation.
Of course, the big question when converting from assembler to C is
what the compiler will do to the code. In general, the results are
very similar.
For example, the original hand-coded small-ticket ticket_lock is:
movl $256, %eax
lock xadd %ax,(%rdi)
1: cmp %ah,%al
je 2f
pause
mov (%rdi),%al
jmp 1b
2:
The C version, compiled by gcc 4.5.1 is:
movl $256, %eax
lock; xaddw %ax, (%rdi)
movzbl %ah, %edx
.L3: cmpb %dl, %al
je .L2
rep; nop
movb (%rdi), %al # lock_1(D)->D.5949.tickets.head, inc$head
jmp .L3 #
.L2:
So very similar, except the compiler misses directly comparing
%ah to %al.
With big tickets, which is what distros are typically compiled with,
the results are:
hand-coded:
movl $65536, %eax #, inc
lock; xaddl %eax, (%rdi) # inc, lock_2(D)->slock
movzwl %ax, %edx # inc, tmp
shrl $16, %eax # inc
1: cmpl %eax, %edx # inc, tmp
je 2f
rep ; nop
movzwl (%rdi), %edx # lock_2(D)->slock, tmp
jmp 1b
2:
Compiled C:
movl $65536, %eax #, tickets
lock; xaddl %eax, (%rdi) # tickets, lock_1(D)->D.5952.tickets
movl %eax, %edx # tickets,
shrl $16, %edx #,
.L3: cmpw %dx, %ax # tickets$tail, inc$head
je .L2 #,
rep; nop
movw (%rdi), %ax # lock_1(D)->D.5952.tickets.head, inc$head
jmp .L3 #
.L2:
In this case the code is pretty much identical except for slight
variations in where the 32-bit values are truncated to 16.
So overall, I think this change will have negligable performance
impact.
Thanks,
J
Jeremy Fitzhardinge (6):
x86/ticketlock: clean up types and accessors
x86/ticketlock: convert spin loop to C
x86/ticketlock: Use C for __ticket_spin_unlock
x86/ticketlock: make large and small ticket versions of spin_lock the
same
x86/ticketlock: make __ticket_spin_lock common
x86/ticketlock: make __ticket_spin_trylock common
arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h | 146 ++++++++++++---------------------
arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock_types.h | 22 +++++-
2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
--
1.7.3.4
next reply other threads:[~2011-01-24 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-24 23:41 Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2011-01-24 23:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/ticketlock: clean up types and accessors Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-01-24 23:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/ticketlock: convert spin loop to C Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-01-24 23:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/ticketlock: Use C for __ticket_spin_unlock Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-01-25 1:13 ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-25 1:42 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-01-25 1:49 ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-24 23:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86/ticketlock: make large and small ticket versions of spin_lock the same Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-01-24 23:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86/ticketlock: make __ticket_spin_lock common Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-01-24 23:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/ticketlock: make __ticket_spin_trylock common Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-01-25 1:16 ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-25 1:42 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-01-25 1:58 ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-27 23:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-01-25 1:08 ` [PATCH 0/6] Clean up ticketlock implementation Nick Piggin
2011-01-31 21:46 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1295909908.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.