All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] seq_file allocation in seq_open()
Date: Tue,  5 May 2015 00:19:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1430777196.git.ydroneaud@opteya.com> (raw)

Hi,

I found myself trying to use seq_open() and experiencing
crash as seq_open() was using my private data in
file->private_data as its own struct seq_file.

It should be noted such behavior is not documented.

It's also an issue if seq_release() is used in release
handler, as it will kfree() a pointer which was not
allocated by seq_open().

So, please find a patchset that drop the support for
pre-allocated struct seq_file in seq_open(): it's
only of use in proc_namespace.c and can be easily
replaced by using seq_open_private()/seq_release_private().

Additionally, it documents the use of file->private_data
to hold pointer to struct seq_file.

Yann Droneaud (3):
  fs: use seq_open_private() for proc_mounts
  fs: allocate structure unconditionally in seq_open()
  fs: documents seq_open()'s usage of file->private_data

 fs/mount.h          |  3 ---
 fs/namespace.c      |  6 +++---
 fs/proc_namespace.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++------------------
 fs/seq_file.c       | 18 +++++++++++-------
 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

-- 
2.1.0


             reply	other threads:[~2015-05-04 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-04 22:19 Yann Droneaud [this message]
2015-05-04 22:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] fs: use seq_open_private() for proc_mounts Yann Droneaud
2015-05-04 22:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs: allocate structure unconditionally in seq_open() Yann Droneaud
2015-05-04 22:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] fs: documents seq_open()'s usage of file->private_data Yann Droneaud

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1430777196.git.ydroneaud@opteya.com \
    --to=ydroneaud@opteya.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.