From: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc: "Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"MyungJoo Ham" <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
"Kyungmin Park" <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
"Chanwoo Choi" <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
"Artur Świgoń" <a.swigon@partner.samsung.com>,
"Angus Ainslie" <angus@akkea.ca>,
"Brendan Higgins" <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] PM: QoS: Restore DEV_PM_QOS_MIN/MAX_FREQUENCY
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:42:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1574699610.git.leonard.crestez@nxp.com> (raw)
Support for frequency limits in dev_pm_qos was removed when cpufreq was
switched to freq_qos, this series attempts to restore it by
reimplementing on top of freq_qos.
Discussion about removal is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/VI1PR04MB7023DF47D046AEADB4E051EBEE680@VI1PR04MB7023.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com/T/#u
The cpufreq core switched away because it needs contraints at the level
of a "cpufreq_policy" which cover multiple cpus so dev_pm_qos coupling
to struct device was not useful. Cpufreq could only use dev_pm_qos by
implementing an additional layer of aggregation anyway.
However in the devfreq subsystem scaling is always performed on a per-device
basis so dev_pm_qos is a very good match. Support for dev_pm_qos in devfreq
core is here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11252409/
That series is RFC mostly because it needs these PM core patches.
Earlier versions got entangled in some locking cleanups but those are
not strictly necessary to get dev_pm_qos functionality.
In theory if freq_qos is extended to handle conflicting min/max values then
this sharing would be valuable. Right now freq_qos just ties two unrelated
pm_qos aggregations for min and max freq.
---
This is implemented by embeding a freq_qos_request inside dev_pm_qos_request:
the data field was already an union in order to deal with flag requests.
The internal freq_qos_apply is exported so that it can be called from
dev_pm_qos apply_constraints.
The dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy function has no obvious equivalent in
freq_qos and the whole approach of "removing requests" is somewhat dubios:
request objects should be owned by consumers and the list of qos requests
should be empty when the target device is deleted.
Changes since v2:
* #define PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY_DEFAULT_VALUE FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE
* #define FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE S32_MAX (in new patch)
* Add initial kunit test for freq_qos, validating the MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE found
by Matthias.
Link to v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11250413/
First two patches can be applied separated
Changes since v1:
* Don't rename or EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL the freq_qos_apply function; just
drop the static marker.
Link to v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11212887/
Leonard Crestez (4):
PM / QoS: Initial kunit test
PM / QOS: Redefine FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE to S32_MAX
PM / QoS: Reorder pm_qos/freq_qos/dev_pm_qos structs
PM / QoS: Restore DEV_PM_QOS_MIN/MAX_FREQUENCY
drivers/base/Kconfig | 4 ++
drivers/base/power/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/base/power/qos-test.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/base/power/qos.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++--
include/linux/pm_qos.h | 86 ++++++++++++++-----------
kernel/power/qos.c | 4 +-
6 files changed, 237 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/base/power/qos-test.c
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-11-25 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-25 16:42 Leonard Crestez [this message]
2019-11-25 16:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] PM / QoS: Initial kunit test Leonard Crestez
2019-11-25 20:19 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-11-26 12:36 ` Leonard Crestez
2019-11-25 16:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] PM / QOS: Redefine FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE to S32_MAX Leonard Crestez
2019-11-25 21:09 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-11-25 16:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] PM / QoS: Reorder pm_qos/freq_qos/dev_pm_qos structs Leonard Crestez
2019-11-25 22:22 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-11-25 16:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] PM / QoS: Restore DEV_PM_QOS_MIN/MAX_FREQUENCY Leonard Crestez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1574699610.git.leonard.crestez@nxp.com \
--to=leonard.crestez@nxp.com \
--cc=a.swigon@partner.samsung.com \
--cc=angus@akkea.ca \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.