From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8F0C433E0 for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 13:00:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD5520776 for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 13:00:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="JztJG87x" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387621AbgEXNA5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 May 2020 09:00:57 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:39139 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387453AbgEXNA5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 May 2020 09:00:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1590325256; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RjH4gglHoTf2uVcb2F2TrW1GZ45Nz0Ss+6/pWuDuMuU=; b=JztJG87xw1eFE5EnU7TWLxjqgVfEmQ1eaFuwoBAcaIB8OjyXGmQ5X7zUTq3bjCUqiaJI+4 2zfmZUbEVvxrL/2zgPxmqD08zsNeYMkSn3EJUTSpzEaGNOJvhO18vap4XZAyRq9QUrJvOO vKPtPi9XCQX38c9mwtK7mll85AHUFZA= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-91-RxT4MpwAPUmdCss1JHdi8w-1; Sun, 24 May 2020 09:00:41 -0400 X-MC-Unique: RxT4MpwAPUmdCss1JHdi8w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6D7D460; Sun, 24 May 2020 13:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from epycfail.redhat.com (unknown [10.36.110.3]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D0E63F8C; Sun, 24 May 2020 13:00:37 +0000 (UTC) From: Stefano Brivio To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Cc: Phil Sutter , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH nft 0/2] Fix evaluation of anonymous sets with concatenated ranges Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 15:00:25 +0200 Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org As reported by both Pablo and Phil, trying to add an anonymous set containing a concatenated range would fail: # nft add rule x y ip saddr . tcp dport { 192.168.2.1 . 20-30 } accept BUG: invalid range expression type concat nft: expression.c:1160: range_expr_value_low: Assertion `0' failed. Aborted # nft add rule t c ip daddr . tcp dport '{ 10.0.0.0/8 . 10-23, 192.168.1.1-192.168.3.8 . 80-443 } accept' BUG: invalid range expression type concat nft: expression.c:1296: range_expr_value_low: Assertion `0' failed. Patch 1/2 fixes this, and 2/2 adds a simple test for it. Stefano Brivio (2): evaluate: Perform set evaluation on implicitly declared (anonymous) sets tests: shell: Introduce test for concatenated ranges in anonymous sets src/evaluate.c | 5 ++++- tests/shell/testcases/sets/0048anonymous_set_concat_0 | 7 +++++++ .../testcases/sets/dumps/0048anonymous_set_concat_0.nft | 6 ++++++ 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100755 tests/shell/testcases/sets/0048anonymous_set_concat_0 create mode 100644 tests/shell/testcases/sets/dumps/0048anonymous_set_concat_0.nft -- 2.26.2